Dan Kenigsberg has posted comments on this change.

Change subject: supervdsmServer is down after failed operation (#846307)
......................................................................


Patch Set 2: I would prefer that you didn't submit this

(3 inline comments)

Please add a unit test that shows that supervdsm handles IOError-raising 
functions properly.

....................................................
Commit Message
Line 5: CommitDate: 2012-09-10 14:32:31 +0300
Line 6: 
Line 7: supervdsmServer is down after failed operation (#846307)
Line 8: 
Line 9: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846307
please add the Bug-Id: tag in front. No need to mention the BZ# in the title, 
too.
Line 10: 
Line 11: After running operation that throws exception that we don't catch in
Line 12: supervdsmServer, we catch it in ProxyCaller::__call__ method.
Line 13: In this except code we reset supervdsmServer and call the same method


....................................................
File vdsm/supervdsm.py
Line 64:             getattr(self._supervdsmProxy._svdsm, self._funcName)(*args,
Line 65:                                                                  
**kwargs)
Line 66:         try:
Line 67:             return callMethod()
Line 68:         except (IOError, socket.error, AuthenticationError):
the root problem is not touched. If the called method raises an IOError, it is 
*not* a good reason for supervdsm to die. The process should be restarted only 
when the supervdsm framework has a bug, not on bugs in its payload.
Line 69:             self._supervdsmProxy._restartSupervdsm()
Line 70: 
Line 71: 
Line 72: class SuperVdsmProxy(object):


Line 65:                                                                  
**kwargs)
Line 66:         try:
Line 67:             return callMethod()
Line 68:         except (IOError, socket.error, AuthenticationError):
Line 69:             self._supervdsmProxy._restartSupervdsm()
silently returning None is a very bad idea in case of an error. Raising an 
exception would be more reasonable.
Line 70: 
Line 71: 
Line 72: class SuperVdsmProxy(object):
Line 73:     """


--
To view, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/7901
To unsubscribe, visit http://gerrit.ovirt.org/settings

Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: Idad4a622b82259b777851d1b0c1b37ec8da2b01e
Gerrit-PatchSet: 2
Gerrit-Project: vdsm
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Owner: Yaniv Bronhaim <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Barak Azulay <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Dan Kenigsberg <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Douglas Schilling Landgraf <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Eduardo <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Igor Lvovsky <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Saggi Mizrahi <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yaniv Bronhaim <[email protected]>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Yeela Kaplan <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
vdsm-patches mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-patches

Reply via email to