Ok. I'm open to the option that I could be wrong. :)
- Steve -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adrian Phillips Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 2:48 AM To: vnc-list@realvnc.com Subject: RE: Hitachi-ZYWRLE Encoding Number (was RE: Introduction of New VNC codec) >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Bostedor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> James, Let me start by pointing to a survey that I have on Steve> the Bozteck website. Steve> http://www.vncscan.com/vs/asppollx/results.asp Steve> It shows that UltraVNC and TightVNC are installed on far Steve> more systems than RealVNC. They should not be downplayed Sorry, but this is ridiculous. Using a survey to come up with such a conclusion is silly. There are quite possibly thousands, perhaps 10s of thousands of Linux installations that use vnc (either realvnc or tightvnc) none of which would appear in this survey. We have been using vnc at work (the AT&T version before) and the realvnc more recently for years and my (and people at work who use vnc) "vote" is not in this survey. Otherwise I agree with Kelly F. Hickel's post. Sincerely, Adrian Phillips -- Who really wrote the works of William Shakespeare ? http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shakespeare/ _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list _______________________________________________ VNC-List mailing list VNC-List@realvnc.com To remove yourself from the list visit: http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
