>From a nuclear science perspective the spectrum is something to get excited about. If a famous laboratory produced this spectrum I think it would be in the news.
Harry On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Well - OK... there is a tiny signal - but let's look at the counts per minute > or per second. > > We are talking about 20 per second or so instead of a background of 4 or so. > This is really "banana level" (bananas are slightly radioactive). > > You would need to see trillions of times this level if there was 5 hours of > SSM - being produced by nuclear fusion. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: H LV > > from > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OAcb975m_AXMFz25zcl07kllERqVjSbZsWv_P1A3xQc/edit?pref=2&pli=1 > Bob Higgins writes: > "There was a significant gamma outburst measured in GS5.2 whose broadband > high energy spectrum is not only unexplainable by known chemistry and > physics, but may also not be explainable by many of the present theories for > LENR!" > > He also says the the spectrum on figure 6 probably continues to rise on the > left side but it drops off due to the detector's sensitivity limit. > > Harry > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Roarty, Francis X > <francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: >> Yes a little underwhelming but if they truly have a hands down recipe >> to repeatable anomalous heat it will probably get a number of industry >> labs and their funding off the fence wrt LENR. Now researchers can >> prove to their management this is real. >> >> Fran >> >> From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:44 AM >> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >> Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ? >> >> >> >> Where is the big surprise? >> >> I woke this morning with anticipation - expecting to see proof from >> MFMP of a 5 hour self-sustained reaction. Instead, we get graphs of >> modest gain at the noise level and radiation counts peaking in the few >> hundred per second – when we need to seeing a million times more - if >> the radiation does indeed relate to excess heat at kilowatt level. >> Yawn. Let’s hope there is much more forthcoming than this. >> >> What am I missing? >
