From: Blaze Spinnaker 

Wow a lot of sound and fury.  Let's all wait for the ERV report or court 
filings from Darden & Co.

Blaze, there will not likely be an ERV report, due to the Lawsuit. First, let 
me say to Walker that there are no selective memories here– only selective 
extracts of Rossi’s unsubstantiated claim, being presented as fact. 

Yes - IH accepted the 2012 Test on face value, before they had their own 
experts assembled - paid a large sum up front to become a player, and hired 
Rossi’s old friends and countrymen to continue the work in Miami. That much is 
not in dispute. It is admirable that they took such a risk since that 2012 
device probably never worked.

The following comments are copyrighted and not for any use outside this forum. 
They are offered as a counterpoint to the blindly supportive comments of 
Rossi’s fan club. There are two sides to most Lawsuits, and IH’s side needs to 
be presented more fairly. They are the good guys here, but that is by default 
as Rossi is a life-long con artist who will be exposed if this goes to trial.

First, there is no proof that IH agreed to any ERV… or that the testing would 
remain exclusively under Rossi’s control. In fact IH seems to have implied that 
they hired experts from Carolina and Rossi would not let them in the facility! 
It is my belief that IH cannot be sure that the blue box device ever ran at 
all, much less produced excess energy. We will have to wait for IH’s legal 
filings to see how deep Rossi’s con-game goes.

The bottom line is that the so-called “customer” was actually the President of 
Leonardo, a plaintiff. And, not only did IH never see any excess heat from any 
device of Rossi – they cannot be sure that it ever ran at all. To the cynic, 
these dynamics could end up looking more like some kind of civil extortion 
attempt than a breach of contract. In fact, all of the pictures from JM show a 
pristine box that simply cannot have been an active boiler – it is too clean. 
Have you ever seen a working boiler? 

Plus, there was no way to use steam in that facility, even if the boiler made 
steam. The steam, if there ever was any, had to be ported to an outside drain 
and was never used for anything of a commercial nature - which implies that the 
“customer” and his so-called business usage of steam is a complete sham.

The so-called ERV report cannot be released for this very reason. First of all, 
it would be an admission that Penon and Fabiani – who are not licensed in the 
USA to do this kind of work, ran an illegal steam boiler in Miami for a year. 
Steam boilers are highly regulated. The civil fine could be several thousand 
dollars per day. The two of them would be immediately deported and probably 
lose their engineering license in Italy, if complaints were filed there. 

IH now has leverage over Johnson, the President of IH, who could lose his legal 
license over permitting an illegal boiler to be run without a permit - if not 
being accused of being a party to a civil extortion attempt, that is: if there 
is proof of that, or if the DA should be able to get an indictment. That’s 
right, this is shaping up to look like more than a contract dispute. 

Look for attorney Johnson to bail very soon, since this is very serious 
business for him, as the President of Leonardo, also a plaintiff and the 
“customer,” and housing the testing space – and therefore a full party to any 
fraud, and there is always a hint of fraud in such conflicting roles. He should 
bail immediately. If the Miami DA thinks Johnson has abetted another of Rossi’s 
scams, then both he and AR are in deep - for more than they bargained for. (I 
am not alleging that either did anything criminal – the DA will decide that).

This explains another reason for the very existence of the Lawsuit. Rossi has 
all this faked data – supposedly 18 volumes and he cannot release it because it 
will screw his friends Penon , Fabiani and Johnson, the President of Leonardo – 
who now, if the DA smells civil extortion, can charge them under RICO. The 
stakes are much higher than you may have imagined because there is so much 
money involved - $100,000,000 plus damages. That is quite a swindle.

Please note, I am not accusing anyone of a crime or even a civil tort, since 
the evidence does not support that yet, and we have not even seen IH’s answer 
to the complaint. The drama is intense, and IH may be partly to blame for not 
being proactice. But a number of recent cases like Fuhrman v. California 
Satellite Systems (1986) have held that a civil action for extortion does in 
fact exist in similar commercial circumstances, but … like most torts this 
requires a showing of damages. 

Rossi definitely has damaged several reputations here – there is no doubt about 
that. Rossi continues to this day to bad mouth IH, Darden, Vaughn etc. They 
came into this with good reputations, Rossi did not. The plaintiffs and their 
Lawyer, made a huge mistake in starting this episode out with a PR release, 
since that opens them to full financial jeopardy – becoming proof of actual 
intent – which is to besmirch the reputation of IH/Cherokee and Darden, and 
Vaughn. 

This could cost Rossi millions, if IH decides to countersue for civil extortion 
– and Penon or Johnson or both were to bail to protect their own financial 
interests. You can almost bet that one or both will get clear of this sinking 
ship - and probably this month if they are smart.

Ian Walker wrote:
Hi all

Some people seem to suffer from a selective memory glitch.

HIGH TEMPERATURE E-CAT MODULE Test of July 16th, 2012 for E-Cat Certification
Was with a three man test team of:
:Fabio Penon , M.Eng. (Nuclear Engineer, Product Certification Specialist) 
E-Cat Electronic Control System Specialist
:Fulvio Fabiani, M.Eng.
Radiation Protection Report:
David Bianchini, M.Sc (Physicist, Radiation Measurements Specialist).

The test was at the behest of IH and paid for by them to their specification, 
using people they selected and agreed too to the tune of $10 million.

Rossi merely continued to use the Nuclear Engineer, Product Certification 
Specialist that IH were satisfied with, at any time in the last few years IH 
could have chosen another engineer, they did not; therefore they were happy 
with him to do the job.

Kind Regards walker

Reply via email to