Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: "I am sure Rossi and Penon claimed the reactor was producing heat on days > when it was turned off and disassembled." > > One of the 4 tigers (250 kilowatt units) was off line. That single unit > failure/repair situation is the reason for the the drop in reactor power to > 750 kilowatts that are seen in the steam production records. >
Axil: people who were there saw that on some days it was TURNED OFF. NOT WORKING. Dead; inoperable; silent; inert. Do you understand? *Not functioning*. Yet the data for those days showed that the flow rate was 36,000 kg and it was producing 1 MW the whole time. That is not a mistake. That's fraud. Quoting a variation of this fact in Exhibit 5: At different points in time during the assumed 350 operational days of the “test” you were measuring, a number of the reactors were turned off (apparently for repair). At even more points in time, different units within the reactors were either turned off or simply disabled. Yet there does not appear to be any impact on the mass flow rate in the system. How is that a credible outcome? In fact, from June 30, 2015 through July 27, 2015, the effective flowed water in the unit was, according to your daily valuation report for that period, 36,000 Kg/d on each and every day, without deviation. See Exhibit B. How is that plausible?" Other people asked these questions. Rossi and Penon never answered. Do you want to make up some kind of bullshit answer as a favor to Rossi -- as his agent? Go ahead, tell us: How is that plausible? How far into cloud cuckoo land are you willing to go? > If all 4 tigers dropped off line, Rossi would have started up the > older 52 unit backup reactor. > Stop with the blather. Stop making up stuff. There was only one reactor. Observers saw that at times it was turned off, yet the data shows it was fully functional for those same times. - Jed
