Has anyone noticed that in the present day older folk are more likely than younger folk to be the ones seriously questioning the establishment? This is a reversal from how it was in Einstein's day and for most of the 20th century.
Harry On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 11:05 AM ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> wrote: > fudging math is standard part of science/physics > > > Einstein's work not even properly translated from German into English, and > was probably done by his wife anyway; so all built on misunderstandings as > per latest talk at ANPA-> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWPi5WC_IV0&feature=emb_logo > > > How relativists lie explained at-> > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnVIceUFXCE > > > all Jedi mind tricks; sins of omission, telephone game etc > > > telephone game-> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHCkzl8Nykc > > > Latest video will be about Einstein and aliens; Pavlov dog tricks etc > > > More time to do this now that on lockdown, normally wouldn't get further > than dealing with videos on unified field theory talks from Vigier > conference > > > https://www.unifiedfieldtheory.co.uk/ > > > > > > > > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Jürg Wyttenbach" <ju...@datamart.ch> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > Sent: Saturday, 28 Nov, 20 At 15:08 > Subject: Re: [Vo]:De Hilster on Einstein fallacy > > Classically the neutrino was invented as a missing link for the standard > model fudge factor math... > > But neutrinos exist somehow as some interactions can be measured. But all > boils down to the question whether neutrinos have a rest mass or not. If > not then all the SM fudging is plain nonsense. > > In real experiments the mass of the neutrino is going down each year. > Currently scored at less than 0.1 eV! Still no problem with SR as mass can > go to infinite if accelerated to light speed. But effects of 0.1eV are in > the error range of background/measurement processes and could also be > resonances. > > The Higgs particle(s) is in fact a simple proton resonance that occurs if > the total flux does one more rotation. The original measured Higgs mass can > exactly be calculated by the basic SO(4) physics metric applied to the > proton! > > Result: CERN now tries to fudge away the higher easy to derive (4D-)proton > mass by changing the measurement. So they get two goals in one: No more two > Higgs particles and a lowers mass that needs a bit more work for the SO(4) > derivation. > > In my view reading standard model (SM) papers dealing with mass is a waste > of live time. But SM is no longer science its a religion! > > J.W. > > On 28.11.2020 15:16, Don86326 wrote: > What do the vocal folk here think of David de Hilster? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p-61TFsGCA < > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p-61TFsGCA> > > > And, do you think the neutrino is a fudge-factor? Being essentially > non-detectable they make a great fudge. The neutrino detection I read about > said that it was hardly proof --another reading in the noise floor --while > the article portended it was proof. Has there been more recent 'hard' proof > of neutrinos? > > OK, I'm a contrarian. > > But, the article I read on the Nobel prize winning Higgs boson detection > also said it was a secondary inferred detection. But after spending > billions, somebody has to get a a prize. And I'm very, very skeptical about > super-duper big-science when career politics always trumps science. Which > is nothing new. > > Michael Faraday was a commoner, a book binder, unable to possibly do good > science, because he did not have noble blood, per his boss. A laughing gas > habit killed Michael's boss, so I reckon Michael did get the last laugh > --as his brilliance was celebrated when his noble control-freak was gone. > > I think the media has a damaging effect on science. Take the entangled > photons from crystals that behave in parallel dynamics for a few > milliseconds... and the media hails it as 'Star Trek Teleportation > Discovered!' Gag me with a spoon, folks. > > My bwain comes with a built-in crystal ball --and the ball says we're all > eventually screwed without more group-sense than our race has shown ability > to ensconce. But our world profits from division, anger, and fear. Big huge > profit. > > Then there's NDAs that shelter corporate science --with devastating law > suites. > > And there's gag-orders delivered by the Department of Defense (American), > who screen ALL patents for new science that us commoners cannot so much as > know without being a treasoner for the knowing. Some classified science > requires anyone aware of the knowledge to have three Ph.D-s. Can anyone > verify that? One gag-order was put on a blacktopping machine that could > pave through the desert with sand... dangerous technology! Enemies have > lots of sand. This was told me by the personal friend of the guy that got > gagged. > > I new an autistic man that was a far removed genius at electronic stuff, > now pass away, that patented an energy storage device, and paid more than > ten thousand dollars for market representation. He paid a military 'flag > man' to market on military IP auctions in cycles of three months. The DoD > showed up, in a classic black van, and delivered a gag order, stating > "never speak of this. Tell anyone you ever told about it that it is now a > treasonous offense to discuss this knowledge." > > Share classified military science after retirement and loose your entire > pension. > > Oh God! Don't get me started on religious suppression of science as a > popular hate-sport by mis-informed people by a network profiting from > negative sensation --a modern media trend trend that has us all programmed > for instant negative thoughts to arrive before deeper positive > inner-ponderings. Hate generates low-stupid of gross naivete. > > Make me really nauseous and talk to me about pseudo-science that attempts > to prove the Bible is the ultimate blueprint of quantum physics. And those > poor flat-earthers. > > > Are we a natural scientist if we... > > Find joy of connecting the dots about mysteries of the universe. > > Find a thrill of another comprehending ones personal inspiration, and in > reverse, especially. > > Find hope in discovering knowledge as a hope to help humanity. > > Thoughts for the holidays? Lamentations of a long career? Instant negative > reactions? Carefully pondered retrospection of changes a 'modern' media has > done to a world once mediated by integrity? Etc? > > > -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
