Can you elaborate on how and why a "resonance decays through the Fibonacci spirals of a protein nanotubel" ? Would other structures, whose geometry is related to the Fibonacci sequence, or to a Golden Spiral, also function like this? Would this shape, for example?
spaz.org/~magi On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:37 AM Don Mitchell <don86...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello vortex-l, > > > *Premise:* Penrose-Hameroff *Orch OR Theory *proposed protein nanotube *is > proper*ly identified as the interface of spirit with brain. > > By Penrose logic, the brain does not generate mind, but is a transceiver > interface composed of protein nanotubes that burst into quantum resonance > about 40 times a second. You and me are minds in the aether activating > quantum relaxation oscillators to be you and me, per Sir Penrose and Dr. > Hameroff. > > In the PH model, quantum resonance decays through the Fibonacci spirals of > a protein nanotube to ultimaltely afford 'when' a neuron fires. > > The electrons of the nanotubes resonate with energy within the quantum > noise-floor (my term) between the atoms of the nanotubes. > > Is this a proper grammatical construct for the *Orch OR Theory*? > > > Druthers? > > Assume the signal propagation of mind is in the aether plenum and is > superluminal and scalar (all directions isotropically). > > By that assumption, 'mind' in the aetheric plenum is a zero-dimensional > oscillation over time, I think. > > > Is 'zero-dimensional' the proper notation for a signal that varied in > quality nearly** everywhere at once? > > > **nearly: superluminal is not infinite. > > > Let's huddle. > > If every neuron is synchopated with the aether, then every neuron is > simultaneously aware of the same signal of 0-D mind in the aether. > > If mind is superluminal, then every neuron active in our pulse-field of > brain-mind is tuned as a whole to one signal, our mind in the aether. > > Thoughts, please? > > Might there be some hint of simultaneity that may be sensorized within our > gray matter? > > > -don >
