>From Robin: ...
> Note that as Hydrino molecules shrink, the protons get closer > together, so their magnetic fields get stronger. If the magnetic > field increases with the inverse cube of the distance, and the > distance itself goes with the inverse square of the primary > quantum number, then that means that the magnetic field goes > as the inverse sixth power of the primary quantum number. That > means that as Hydrinos shrink, the magnetic field between the > protons grows very rapidly such that molecules can be bound > together by the proton magnetic fields, while being electrically > neutral overall. These magnetic bonds can rapidly reach a > strength well beyond normal chemical energy bonds. IOW such a > cluster is not easily torn apart by normal thermal energy, i.e. > it can have a high melting point. Just a brief side-comment... Some of this "lingo" is fascinating stuff to me. Having performed a lot of theoretical computer simulation work on my own using good'ol fashion Newtonian based Celestial Mechanics algorithms, where typically I use "a = 1/r^2", I noticed orbital pattern behavior transforms into something RADICALLY different, such as if I were to change the classical algorithm to something like "a = 1/r^3". You can also combine both of them like "a = 1/r^2 +/- 1/r^3" within the same computer algorithm. That produces interesting side effects too. I'm still trying to get a handle on it all. Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
