It is a mystery why nobody seems to be giving DGT (or PDGT) enough credit for being able to enlist credible scientific expertise, and then to replicate a 17 year old experiment in the public domain. These are intelligent people, and they are wealthy.
Unless this drama is about stupidity or poverty, then they easily could have retained all rights to E-Cat technology (or resold their position to many companies). But consider that when the truth is finally known - DGT may not have wanted the contract at the original price. IOW, this could be a bargaining strategy since they had discovered that the Thermacore reactor works as well, or almost as well. Of course, if it is all about having no money, then that is another way to look at it. Everyone seems to have backed off of that possibility for now. And most of the people involved are reputed to be very wealthy. Anyone with a few million can hire good scientists in the USA and top scientists over there. Why would they not have hired good scientists if they have both the capital and the inspiration (from having seen E-Cat first hand)? All that DGT needed to do in this instance - assuming that all of the parties are honest is to present to the Greek government with a working reactor that proved to be safe while producing substantial heat and which they CAN and Will take into production if they have to. The testing agency would likely not have even tested the claim of excess heat, but there could easily have been excess, if they had looked for it. The testers must know the identity of all the ingredients which are in there, so DGT can tell them every detail, if this is based on Thermacore's work. It does not matter if it worked extremely well or moderately well. The testing was for safety- not performance. Thus the Greek Officials could have verified the safety of a Hyperion reactor that is marketable, even if not the E-Cat. "Apparently" they did verify something, but has anyone actually seen the translated report? And most of all - DGT could be willing to go to market with a Thermacore knock-off, even if the E-Cat is better. That is their bargaining chip. Even without knowing the precise ingredients of the E-Cat design, DGT could very easily have read and replicated the following paper from 1994, submitted to the US agency DARPA by one the most respected high-tech companies in the World: Thermacore (they actually invented the 'heat pipe' for instance). http://free-energy.xf.cz/H2/papers/Anomalous-Heat-from-Atomic-Hydrogen.pdf We have referred to this paper dozens of times over the years, so it is no secret. If DGT do not tune into vortex of course, then there is no hope for them :-) While it is true that such an old reactor design, which came along before the advent of "nano" anything - might not have been as robust as E-Cat, this old design produced many watts of excess energy for a long time (Thermacore later was able to run it over a year in continuous OU mode - up to 100,000 excess watt-hrs has been mentioned) and best of all for the purposes of this official testing: zero radioactivity. But simply going 'nano' in 2011 would probably have improved it significantly. This 1994 episode is the greatest missed opportunity in all of alternative energy. Shortly after this report, the company was sold to Modine, many of the participants took early retirement - and the new owners dropped the project for unknown reasons. At any rate, this 17 year old design could have been built in a few weeks and have passed the Greek Gov'm't tests with flying colors. Rossi may not have even known about it. It might sell like hotcakes if the price comes in at much less than E-Cat. Thus, everyone is as honest as they can be about what they have said, given that they did not know the machinations taking place behind the scenes. It is even possible, as we have been saying, that by simply going to 'nano' with the old Thermacore design, DGT would have greatly exceeded the old 1994 results, and that "breakthrough" is what led them to pursue a strategy of renegotiating the original contract to get a better deal, or to delay the large sum further into the future. The more one thinks about the alternatives, the suggestion of this episode being little more than a bargaining chip in a larger financial drama, is likely to be at least partly accurate. Nothing else makes as much sense. Jones From: Daniel Rocha Or that both Rossi and Defkalion have proprietary cores but only Rossi has the catalyzer. Alan J Fletcher wrote: Rossi could have hand-carried a core to Defkalion, run tests, and then taken it way with him.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
