Plausible deniability is the 'modus operandi' of the zealous skeptic.

Harry

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
<gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote:
> With meteorite sightings you have many witnesses in many countries. The path
> of the meteorite can be traced sometime (if the witness knows a little about
> constellations and cardinal directions). Only collecting a lot of this
> information one can apply it for useful science.
>
> I think in general the main problem with these LENR claims (not just
> the anecdotal ones describing the actions of people and organizations but
> also the more scientific, phenomenon oriented ones) is the lack
> of repeatability and  the absence of large number of widespread, reliable
> witnesses. Until LENR is something that every amateur enthusiast can
> reproduce and post on youtube, it will remain in the realm of
> pseudoscience.
>
> Giovanni
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> All the other statements you make are based on your witness's report to
>>> you. I want to give the benefit of doubt to that but I don't consider it
>>> factual evidence at this point.
>>
>>
>> Why not?
>>
>> Do you think I am making it up? Do you think my informant is crazy?
>>
>> This resembles an observational science claim, such as birdwatcher
>> sighting, or meteorite. All such claims can be faked. They are always
>> dependent upon the credibility of the person making the report. It resembles
>> Mizuno's claim that his cell produced massive anomalous heat over five days,
>> evaporating 17.5 L of water. It was witnessed only by Mizuno and Akimoto.
>> you have to depend upon their honesty.
>>
>> I will grant this case is a unusual because my contact must remain
>> anonymous for a while. Anyone familiar with the politics of cold fusion will
>> know that people often keep a low profile for good reasons. That is
>> regrettable, but it is entirely the fault of the opposition.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>

Reply via email to