If it is a cooler, it appears to violate the first law.
If it is an energy converter, it appears to violate the second law.

I guess the question is: what is it?



Harry

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The diode is working as a cooler.
>
> 2012/2/28 Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com>
>>
>> According to the second law you can only get a system to do "work"  if
>> parts of the system are at different temperatures. In this situation
>> the system is a diode and it does work by converting heat into light.
>> It is hard to tell from the description, but I am guessing the entire
>> diode is at an  elevated temperature.
>>
>> harry
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Why do you think it would violate the 2nd law? I don't understand.
>> >
>> > 2012/2/28 Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Pay attention at this:
>> >> >
>> >> > " Experiments directly confirm for the first time that this behavior
>> >> > continues beyond the conventional limit of unity
>> >> > electrical-to-optical
>> >> > power
>> >> > conversion efficiency."
>> >> >
>> >> > It is above the conventional, not that it produces energy out of
>> >> > nothing.
>> >> > This is just a way of saying that it exceeded expectation of light
>> >> > emission
>> >> > for a LED.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Yes. It uses electricity to change heat into light. The abstract:
>> >>
>> >> "A heated semiconductor light-emitting diode at low forward bias
>> >> voltage V<kBT/q is shown to use electrical work to pump heat from the
>> >> lattice to the photon field. Here the rates of both radiative and
>> >> nonradiative recombination have contributions at linear order in V. As
>> >> a result the device’s wall-plug (i.e., power conversion) efficiency is
>> >> inversely proportional to its output power and diverges as V
>> >> approaches zero. Experiments directly confirm for the first time that
>> >> this behavior continues beyond the conventional limit of unity
>> >> electrical-to-optical power conversion efficiency."
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> however, wouldn't this require a violation of the second law of
>> >> thermodynamics?
>> >>
>> >> Harry
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Rocha - RJ
>> > danieldi...@gmail.com
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Rocha - RJ
> danieldi...@gmail.com
>

Reply via email to