I wish it was only my curiosity that were suffering. I feel more disappointed than anxious for results.
2012/2/29 Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > Making tests- internal or with other parties is now > a routine activity for DGT; tests can be of different duration and can > differ by other parameters too. Till > we have no data and other information, we cannot say what the tests show. > The tests are done with and for people who will take decisions and have > influence. > If these people do not need or do not like publicity,our curiosity will > suffer. > Peter > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> So, each reaction merely last 12 hours and not 48 hours. 2 teams already, >> when we just expected only 1. *facepalm* >> >> This story gets worse and worse for DGT. >> >> >> >> >> 2012/2/29 Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> >> >>> *UPDATED* (February 29): In an interview with New Technology, said >>> Alexandros Xanthoulis that the test was conducted on 24 February and that >>> it is not focused on security, as the product is ready for such tests. The >>> focus instead was to show that the released heat energy from a "Low Energy >>> Nuclear Reaction" and not from a chemical source. The test lasted for >>> 24 hours and comprising both an empty and active site reactor changed after >>> 12 hours. Xanthoulis also told that two of the seven international >>> groups have already carried out their tests and that the final test is >>> scheduled for late March. He did not know when or if the test results >>> will be published. / End update /. >>> >>> >>> http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyteknik.se%2Fnyheter%2Fenergi_miljo%2Fenergi%2Farticle3419329.ece >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> From: alain.sep...@gmail.com >>> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:59:44 +0100 >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety >>> (NyTeknik) >>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1272&p=6889#p6889 >>> Defkalion disagree with that article: >>> >>> "Nytechnik article is 100% wrong based on pure speculations of the >>> journalist. >>> We expect his response after a direct communication with him. >>> DGT" >>> >>> 2012/2/29 Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> >>> >>> Defkalion failed to make it clear on their forum that the government >>> representatives have so far only evaluated the Hyperion's safety. >>> Surely, they realize that most people interpreted their vague >>> annoncement of "positive results" as "positive measures of energy >>> gain". Why do we have to learn through Mats Lewan what they really >>> meant? >>> >>> Harry >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > " The test was supposed to start on Friday 24 February, but according >>> to >>> > sources of Ny Teknik it was initiated only after the weekend. The >>> sources >>> > also said that the test was not focused on power or energy >>> measurements but >>> > rather on safety." >>> > >>> > http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3419346.ece >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Daniel Rocha - RJ >>> > danieldi...@gmail.com >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> danieldi...@gmail.com >> >> > > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
