DGT may not owe us anything, but I don't owe them anything either. Defkalion has shown us nothing, and Rossi just had some demos that he was in complete control of. I don't owe them any patience, though I will still wait until March 31. If nothing happens by then, there is no reason for me to pay any more attention to this. Maybe it's just me, but if I was in Defkalion's position, I'd get independent verification as soon as possible. They should get plenty of money through awards and licenses if they sell the product to a large company. Everyday, the world is wasting billions of dollars and millions of people are dying unnecessarily. Just the discovery of an LENR device that produces useful energy output would end this waste immediately. Does it really make a difference if you are making a billion dollars in a world where basically everything is free? I would be happy enough knowing I helped every single person on the planet, and I wouldn't care much about the money. I'm not big into conspiracy theories. Oil companies would probably just switch to something dealing with LENR and make more money than before. If you're a scientist, it would create tons of good paying jobs, and you are at the forefront in an exciting new era of civilization. On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> Hi Guenter -- your reply-to address is your own email address. > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Guenter Wildgruber <gwildgru...@ymail.com> > wrote: > > DGT did not make a substantial error up to now. > Btw, my own projects often have delays and complications and modifications. > That's the way it is. > > In a situation like DGK or Rossi You have to fight against a headwind of 99%, > and the rest is a substantial lot of idiots, who cannot tell the difference > between a hole and a substantial spot. > > I agree with Defkalion that they are not obligated to continue to publicly > discuss their progress. But from a PR perspective I think it's a gauche move > to close their forum in this way. They've given skeptics additional > credibility in calling the two main high-profile commercial LENR initiatives > scams. Perhaps this will not affect Defkalion's own business plan since > they're self-funded, but it could have ramifications for others who are > interested in exploring the topic. > > It might have been preferable for Defkalion not to attempt to engage the > public at all and to stay in stealth mode as long as possible. I can > understand their learning about PR as they go. But with opinions so set > against LENR in some mainstream scientific circles, here's to hoping that > other initiatives will steer a steadier course in how they communicate to the > public what they're doing. > > Eric >
