Do not expect to see any data from these tests: "Until Defkalion Green Technologies has its product, we shall no longer get involved in the games and blogs of online media. Our next announcement in the coming months will be that of a successful and certified product."
http://defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1278 Data is surely a part of these online games. 2012/2/29 Jouni Valkonen <jounivalko...@gmail.com> > I do not see how they have changed their test protocol. They did this just > like they told to do, that is a twin test. I guess that they first thought > to do it 2x24 hours, but 2x12 hours was find to be enough for the testing > purpose, that was to demonstrate the cold fusion effect. Of course these > kind of tests do not give information on long term performance. > > But anyway, we need to wait for the report if it is going to be published > before April 1st, when all planned tests are finished. > > --Jouni > > On 29 Feb 2012, at 19:52, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Defkalion does not bother to explain why these tests differ > > significantly from those that were originally planned. It is ok to > > change plans, but without an explanation it makes their behaviour look > > suspicious. Similarly they never explained why the tests planned for > > last august never occured. IMO, this is bad PR on their part. > > > > Harry > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Peter Gluck <peter.gl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Making tests- internal or with other parties is now > >> a routine activity for DGT; tests can be of different duration and can > >> differ by other parameters too. Till > >> we have no data and other information, we cannot say what the tests > show. > >> The tests are done with and for people who will take decisions and have > >> influence. > >> If these people do not need or do not like publicity,our curiosity will > >> suffer. > >> Peter > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> > >>> So, each reaction merely last 12 hours and not 48 hours. 2 teams > already, > >>> when we just expected only 1. *facepalm* > >>> > >>> This story gets worse and worse for DGT. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 2012/2/29 Robert Leguillon <robert.leguil...@hotmail.com> > >>>> > >>>> UPDATED (February 29): In an interview with New Technology, said > >>>> Alexandros Xanthoulis that the test was conducted on 24 February and > that it > >>>> is not focused on security, as the product is ready for such tests. > The > >>>> focus instead was to show that the released heat energy from a "Low > Energy > >>>> Nuclear Reaction" and not from a chemical source. The test lasted for > 24 > >>>> hours and comprising both an empty and active site reactor changed > after 12 > >>>> hours. Xanthoulis also told that two of the seven international > groups have > >>>> already carried out their tests and that the final test is scheduled > for > >>>> late March. He did not know when or if the test results will be > published. / > >>>> End update /. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nyteknik.se%2Fnyheter%2Fenergi_miljo%2Fenergi%2Farticle3419329.ece > >>>> > >>>> ________________________________ > >>>> From: alain.sep...@gmail.com > >>>> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:59:44 +0100 > >>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT's 1st test did not test power, just safety > >>>> (NyTeknik) > >>>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1272&p=6889#p6889 > >>>> Defkalion disagree with that article: > >>>> > >>>> "Nytechnik article is 100% wrong based on pure speculations of the > >>>> journalist. > >>>> We expect his response after a direct communication with him. > >>>> DGT" > >>>> > >>>> 2012/2/29 Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> > >>>> > >>>> Defkalion failed to make it clear on their forum that the government > >>>> representatives have so far only evaluated the Hyperion's safety. > >>>> Surely, they realize that most people interpreted their vague > >>>> annoncement of "positive results" as "positive measures of energy > >>>> gain". Why do we have to learn through Mats Lewan what they really > >>>> meant? > >>>> > >>>> Harry > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> " The test was supposed to start on Friday 24 February, but according > >>>>> to > >>>>> sources of Ny Teknik it was initiated only after the weekend. The > >>>>> sources > >>>>> also said that the test was not focused on power or energy > measurements > >>>>> but > >>>>> rather on safety." > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/energi_miljo/energi/article3419346.ece > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Daniel Rocha - RJ > >>>>> danieldi...@gmail.com > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Daniel Rocha - RJ > >>> danieldi...@gmail.com > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dr. Peter Gluck > >> Cluj, Romania > >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > >> > > > > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com
