Whatever. Defkalion and Rossi themselves said they would have independent verification by the end of March. On Feb 29, 2012, at 11:18 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote:
> You are in such a hurry. I will wait until Oct30th. I chose this date last > year, for a 3rd party confirmation of a working product, because it is close > to AR`s 1MW test. I will apply the same date to DGT. > > 2012/3/1 Jarold McWilliams <oldja...@hotmail.com> > DGT may not owe us anything, but I don't owe them anything either. Defkalion > has shown us nothing, and Rossi just had some demos that he was in complete > control of. I don't owe them any patience, though I will still wait until > March 31. If nothing happens by then, there is no reason for me to pay any > more attention to this. Maybe it's just me, but if I was in Defkalion's > position, I'd get independent verification as soon as possible. They should > get plenty of money through awards and licenses if they sell the product to a > large company. Everyday, the world is wasting billions of dollars and > millions of people are dying unnecessarily. Just the discovery of an LENR > device that produces useful energy output would end this waste immediately. > Does it really make a difference if you are making a billion dollars in a > world where basically everything is free? I would be happy enough knowing I > helped every single person on the planet, and I wouldn't care much about the > money. I'm not big into conspiracy theories. Oil companies would probably > just switch to something dealing with LENR and make more money than before. > If you're a scientist, it would create tons of good paying jobs, and you are > at the forefront in an exciting new era of civilization. > > On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:46 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > >> Hi Guenter -- your reply-to address is your own email address. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Guenter Wildgruber <gwildgru...@ymail.com> >> wrote: >> >> DGT did not make a substantial error up to now. >> Btw, my own projects often have delays and complications and modifications. >> That's the way it is. >> >> In a situation like DGK or Rossi You have to fight against a headwind of >> 99%, and the rest is a substantial lot of idiots, who cannot tell the >> difference between a hole and a substantial spot. >> >> I agree with Defkalion that they are not obligated to continue to publicly >> discuss their progress. But from a PR perspective I think it's a gauche >> move to close their forum in this way. They've given skeptics additional >> credibility in calling the two main high-profile commercial LENR initiatives >> scams. Perhaps this will not affect Defkalion's own business plan since >> they're self-funded, but it could have ramifications for others who are >> interested in exploring the topic. >> >> It might have been preferable for Defkalion not to attempt to engage the >> public at all and to stay in stealth mode as long as possible. I can >> understand their learning about PR as they go. But with opinions so set >> against LENR in some mainstream scientific circles, here's to hoping that >> other initiatives will steer a steadier course in how they communicate to >> the public what they're doing. >> >> Eric >> > > > > > -- > Daniel Rocha - RJ > danieldi...@gmail.com >
