Hi Guenter -- your reply-to address is your own email address.
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Guenter Wildgruber <gwildgru...@ymail.com>wrote: DGT did not make a substantial error up to now. > Btw, my own projects often have delays and complications and > modifications. That's the way it is. > > In a situation like DGK or Rossi You have to fight against a headwind of > 99%, and the rest is a substantial lot of idiots, who cannot tell the > difference between a hole and a substantial spot. > I agree with Defkalion that they are not obligated to continue to publicly discuss their progress. But from a PR perspective I think it's a gauche move to close their forum in this way. They've given skeptics additional credibility in calling the two main high-profile commercial LENR initiatives scams. Perhaps this will not affect Defkalion's own business plan since they're self-funded, but it could have ramifications for others who are interested in exploring the topic. It might have been preferable for Defkalion not to attempt to engage the public at all and to stay in stealth mode as long as possible. I can understand their learning about PR as they go. But with opinions so set against LENR in some mainstream scientific circles, here's to hoping that other initiatives will steer a steadier course in how they communicate to the public what they're doing. Eric
