OK, so you don't think you need an experiment.

Go fuck yourself.

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> **
> I am unsure about your point or what you are asking.
>
> What exactly is your discussion point or what exactly is your question?
>
> Of course,there are strong inference.  For example, if you find the
> presence of Information in DNA, that is an inference for Intelligent
> Designer, not Darwinian Evolution based on randon chance mutations.  Random
> processes never create Information, because information is "Order", the
> exact opposite of Randomness.
>
> For instance, the assembling of random letters into a coherent sentence
> requires the input of an Intelligent being.  If your throw a bunch of
> Scrabble letters on the ground, the following 2 sentences have equal chance
> of occuring.
>
> "There is a God"
>
> "ethresi da Go"         -    (No, this is not a foreign language.  This is
> a random mixture of the same letters above.)
>
>
> What is the difference between the 2 sentences above.  Nothing as far as
> randon chance is concerned.  Yet for an Intelligent Entity, there is a huge
> difference.  What differentiates the 2 sentences?  It is Information of
> course.  There is information in the first sentence that conveys an idea?
> And Ideas are the purvue of Intelligent Beings.
>
> Now, do this with 4 letters and create a sentence 600,000 letters long;
> you might begin to understand the complexity and the remarkable presence of
> Information in our DNA.
>
>
> Jojo
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Sent:* Sunday, May 27, 2012 9:42 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR)
>
> No.  I'm talking about the scientific technique of strong inference.
>
> In strong inference you are not simply testing a hypothesis.  You are
> admitting multiple hypotheses in the formulation of your experiments and
> attempting to most economically compare them.  It is legitimate, of course,
> to have any number of experiments to achieve this comparison.
>
> In this case, there are two hypotheses:  Darwinian Evolution and
> Intelligent Design.
>
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 6:27 AM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> **
>> Distinguish what from what?
>>
>> Are you asking if there are experiments in Darwinian Evolution and
>> experiments in Intelligent Design?
>>
>>
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>
>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
>> *Sent:* Sunday, May 27, 2012 7:08 PM
>> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Darwinian Evolution (Was Tritium in Ni-H LENR)
>>
>> Jojo,
>>
>> Where is the controlled experiment that distinguishes between the two?
>>  There are LOTS of controlled experiments demonstrating cold fusion.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to