There are situation where comfortable doubt is just another delusion.
If you apply the same standard of proof to normal facts, nothing is proven.

LENR is real, so why apply the stupid "exceptional evidence" ?


good critics don't need "exceptional bias".

the behavior of DGT is not coherent with having nothing, nor having low
power.
however it is coherent with unexpected problems for DGT, or with better
more professional public relation management.

2012/7/8 Guenter Wildgruber <gwildgru...@ymail.com>

> A (psycho)analysis of Rossi/DGT or an exercise in the theory and practice
> of (self-)deception.
>
> There is some LENR effect, I am sure. This just as a disclaimer.
>
> We all can bend spoons,right?,
> But Uri Geller did it better.
> Why?
> He had a magic sauce.
>
> Interestingly enough Feynman met Geller, and had to say this:
> ...
> I also looked into extrasensory perception, and PSI phenomena, and the
> latest craze there was Uri Geller, a man who is supposed to be able to bend
> keys by rubbing them with his finger. So I went to his hotel room, on his
> invitation, to see a demonstration of both mindreading and bending keys. He
> didn't do any mindreading that succeeded; nobody can read my mind, I guess.
> And my boy held a key and Geller rubbed it, and nothing happened. Then he
> told us it works better under water, and so you can picture all of us
> standing in the bathroom with the water turned on and the key under it, and
> him rubbing the key with his finger. Nothing happened. So I was unable to
> investigate that phenomenon.
> ...
> --> 'Cargo Cult Science'
>
> Actually Feynman did not figure out what Geller's trick was, but it was
> one, which later on was found to be some chemical treatment of his spoons,
> which Geller did not seem to have at hand when Feynman visited him.
> Now Geller is still a celebrity in some circles, whereas Feynman is known
> to some physics geeks and folks eg interested in the analysis of the
> Challenger-catastropy, where he applied common sense and some basic
> principles. No quantum magic. Not so spectacular, right?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster
>
> As said.
> A cautionary tale.
> Hope I am wrong.
>
> Guenter
>
>

Reply via email to