I find that if I ignore my kids when they act up, it usually goes away.  It
is usually them looking for attention.  I was taught that from a PhD family
psychologist and it works.  You might try the same.  It has a lot to do
with maturity.


On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax 
<a...@lomaxdesign.com>wrote:

> Stewart and Rothwell don't realize the implications of leaving seriously
> offensive posts in the Vortex archive, without response. I am responding to
> only a few of Jojo's posts, he's been flooding the list. After promising to
> stop, he posted 20 times here yesterday, and 28 times today, carrying on
> quite as before.
>
> I responded seven times yesterday and seven today. (Direct responses to
> Jojo). My responses will naturally become rarer and shorter.
>
> Responding on VortexB-l is *useless.* The VortexB archive on Beatty's web
> site is *inaccessible.*
>
> I'm not engaged in a conversation with Jojo Jaro. That ended long ago. I'm
> in a conversation with *others*, most of whom are not now present. I would
> not bring this conversation here, it was brought here, insistently, and
> it's maintained here because, I assume, of the absence of Bill. If you
> really want to do something about that, contact him. I've tried and so have
> others apparently. So far, no response. I'm worried about him.
>
>
> At 08:52 PM 1/2/2013, ChemE Stewart wrote:
>
>> I agree 100%
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 2, 2013, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>> Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <a...@lomaxdesign.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please remove this discussion to VortexB-L.
>>
>>
>> I doubt that will happen. VortexB-l does not appear to be googleable. So
>> from Jojo's point of view, it could be useless.
>>
>>
>> I have already filtered out Jojo. So why don't YOU take this discussion
>> to VortexB-L. Respond to him there, if you must. Or I will filter out you,
>> too.
>>
>> Enough is enough.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>
>

Reply via email to