Infinite.

He said "The current system I am working off of is at 0.25 to 1 W with no
input"

That's .25W/0W at "minimum".

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:

> Dennis,
>
>  I would like to hear a little more about your experiment.  What COP are
> you measuring at this time and are you able to determine the temperature of
> the reaction components?
>
>  Any information would be greatly appreciated and some among this list
> might be able to offer suggestions.
>
>  Dave
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DJ Cravens <djcrav...@hotmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Wed, Mar 6, 2013 11:07 am
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Miley Arpa-E startup project reloaded! vote for for 10
> days.. hurry up
>
>
>
> The current system I am working off of is at 0.25 to 1 W with no input.
> This is with about 25 grams
> of sample (density about 3 gm/ml - metal in C). This is in a heavy metal
> sphere with gas pressure
> generated in situ and sealed. The temperature is near room temp when not
> insulated.
>
> Higher power densities can be reached by stimulation but at the expense of
> COP.
> I am hoping that there will be a trade off of volume/surface area,
> stimulation and COP,
> heat generation and power extraction.
>
> Part of the problem is making a simple "variable heat path" so that power
> extraction and
> working temperature are balanced.
>
> But I have likely said too much- this is not the proper forum for such
> things. With luck
> I will have a poster at ICCF for specifics. (But it will likely be ignored
> like my high temp
> metal/gas was at DC).
>
>
>  Dennis
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:00:56 -0500
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miley Arpa-E startup project reloaded! vote for for 10
> days.. hurry up
> From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
>  .......
>
>  I prefer to try to take only a step of a factor of 10 or so with the
> LENR part  . . .
>
> Where would that bring you in terms of power, temperature and power
> density?
>
>  - Jed
>
>

Reply via email to