It appears that you are seeing infinite COP as James suggested.  You should be 
able to make a good impression upon the ICCF crowd particularly if you can show 
sufficient heating of your device without any drive.  You should be prepared to 
open up the container after a demonstration that is well witnessed to allow 
interested parties to examine the materials within.  They will be attempting to 
ensure that there is nothing strange occurring or that chemicals, batteries, 
and etc. are not hidden.


As you imply, 1 watt is not a lot of power and I see that you are aware that 
when you attempt to extract energy that the reaction might collapse under 
loading.  This is what is expected in my system models.


Can I assume that you have a nickel-hydrogen type arrangement?


Dave



-----Original Message-----
From: James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wed, Mar 6, 2013 11:17 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miley Arpa-E startup project reloaded! vote for for 10 days.. 
hurry up


Infinite.


He said "The current system I am working off of is at 0.25 to 1 W with no input"


That's .25W/0W at "minimum".


On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:14 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:

Dennis,


I would like to hear a little more about your experiment.  What COP are you 
measuring at this time and are you able to determine the temperature of the 
reaction components?


Any information would be greatly appreciated and some among this list might be 
able to offer suggestions.


Dave




-----Original Message-----
From: DJ Cravens <djcrav...@hotmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wed, Mar 6, 2013 11:07 am
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Miley Arpa-E startup project reloaded! vote for for 10 days.. 
hurry up




The current system I am working off of is at 0.25 to 1 W with no input. This 
iswith about 25 grams 
of sample(density about 3 gm/ml - metal in C). This is in a heavy metal sphere 
with gaspressure 
generatedin situ and sealed. The temperature is near room temp when not 
insulated. 

Higherpower densities can be reached by stimulation but at the expense of COP.  
I am hopingthat there will be a trade off of volume/surface area, stimulation 
and COP,
heatgeneration and power extraction. 
 
Part of theproblem is making a simple "variable heat path" so that 
powerextraction and
workingtemperature are balanced. 

But I havelikely said too much- this is not the proper forum for such things. 
With luck
I will havea poster at ICCF for specifics. (But it will likely be ignored like 
my hightemp
metal/gaswas at DC). 

 

Dennis
 

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:00:56 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miley Arpa-E startup project reloaded! vote for for 10 days.. 
hurry up
From: jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com


.......


I preferto try to take only a step of a factor of 10 or so with the LENR part  
. . .


Where would that bring you in terms of power, temperature and power density?


- Jed



                                          
 




 

Reply via email to