On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Edmund Storms <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mar 6, 2013, at 9:46 AM, DJ Cravens wrote: > > CMNS started (or restarted) with the intent of experimental discussions > but it is seldom that, now mostly > spinning theories- Seldom any "nuts and bolts". I think the only real > forum for nuts and bolts are papers and > posters these days. > > > The subject is theory now but any discussion of nuts and bolts would be > welcome. You only need to create the interest. > > > I expect to just write up a simple poster for the meeting and go from > there. I am staying busy these days. > After all this is all just a "hobby" for me and life goes on. > I am hoping to find enough "hot" samples to fill my "jug". > > The problems are the trade offs in COP, absolute power, temperature,.... > I think Mitch got to around 20 with stimulation at MIT but very very low > absolute power. > I am doing a similar electrical stimulation of loaded powder but with C > instead of ceramic > separators to avoid sintering and it allows for greater currents and > controls. > > Rossi* claims *to have high power but at lower COP (it gets lower each > time I look). > You need to be above 5 and preferably above 10 if you have to stimulate > the samples. > And then you need a big sample for more power. I just never could get much > from > Un-stimulated gas and Ni. I am stuck with Pd and D, but then the cost is > through the roof > for a reasonably large system. (however, additives seem to help) > > > The big question is WHY is this effect so difficult to cause and WHY is > the amount so small? This question requires a theory to answer. Do you > have an answer? > > Ed > > > Dennis**** > > ** ** > > > ------------------------------ > CC: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Miley Arpa-E startup project reloaded! vote for for 10 > days.. hurry up > Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:13:48 -0700 > > Dennis, the CMNS group is the proper forum. Would you explain what you are > proposing there? > > Ed > > Excuse me Ed, for mixing in, a small answer to the Big Question: > > - because the number/density of functional NAE is too small, the initial ones are exhausted fast and new ones are not formed. NAE-genesis is the crux of the problem. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
