IIsn’t this a testimony to first hand experimental experience? “…I said ok, a different group in a similar configuration, if you can show me ten times more energy coming out than the electrical energy input, and my day job is, as I said, is careful measurements of energy. Input energy, output energy. So we set up the test, showed them what to do, made the measurements. And yes, there was at least ten times more energy being produced than electrical input energy. And at that point, I got semi-hooked.
If not a firsthand testimony, what do these words say in reality? …another con man? Chees: Axil On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Axil, you shouldn’t be name-dropping if you do not know the facts. **** > > ** ** > > Did you check to see if McKubre has a financial interest in one (or more) > of the companies promoting the Papp technology? He was on the Board of one > of them several years ago IIRC.**** > > ** ** > > This does not mean that he cannot offer an unbiased opinion, but notice > that he does not speak from personal experience … it is “what Bob told me” > and it is about events that happened over thirty years ago. Since he cannot > personally vouch for having seen an engine self-running – then why mention > his name?**** > > ** ** > > Answer: because all the other evidence is even weaker. **** > > ** ** > > Where is the magic engine from the Nolan demo? Or the affidavits that the > Patent Office cannot find. Do you have a million dollar (no billion dollar) > engine running - and then later send it to the junk yard, retire to Florida > and never mention it again? Maybe you do if you know it was ever more a > scam.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* Axil Axil **** > > *Fr*om the panel, McKubre felt compelled to offer testimony to the > validity, promise, power and the mystery of Papp technology.**** > > ** ** >
