Ken shoulders has discovered something he call a black EV(a ball of electrons).
The propagation of EVs through a gas atmosphere produces very thin, bright ion streamers in the gas or along the wall of the envelope. In an electrodeless device, other EVs may follow along the same sheath of an ion streamer formed by a preceding EV. The thickness of the ion sheath increases as multiple EVs propagate along the same streamer. If the gas pressure is very low, EVs will propagate without the formation of a visible streamer. Such are known as "black" EVs. On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:23 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > The study of this phenomena will be interesting. I can imagine that a > large lightning discharge would be proceeded by many small unsuccessful > attempts. I do not recall a rule that states that once a charge movement > is initiated that it must continue to a large conclusion. Perhaps the > dark lightning is one of these smaller events that does not involve enough > current to be visible. > > For my hypothesis to be possible it is necessary for the electric field > to vary within a thunder cloud. This seems like a reasonable assumption. > You need a relatively short space between the positive and negative charge > carriers where an intense electric field resides. This field might be > modulated by nearby discharges that lead to local intensification. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 2:15 pm > Subject: RE: [Vo]:Dark Lightning > > The first thing that came to mind for the missing bolt was Dirac "reciprocal > space". Can lightning sometimes end up in reciprocal space? If so, it should > be some kind of Fourier transform. This site turned up: > http://www.rodenburg.org/theory/Reciprocalspace20.html > > ... which is interesting, but another site other may actually give us a > better and mundane explanation: > http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/12/101223-lightning-x-rays-came > ra-science-technology/ > > Which suggests that a lightning bolt carries almost all its x-ray radiation > in its tip. > > Thus, if an observer saw only lots of x-rays and no flash of light, a > plausible explanation is that the bolt was coming directing at the observer. > Another observer located almost anywhere else far removed, could see the > bolt from its side angle as a string-like bolt. But if that bolt is mostly > in your line of sight, it would be mostly dark. > > OK, then why was the observer not fried by the bolt coming directly towards > him - if the bolt was aligned in his direct line of sight? > > Although most lightning strikes do hit the ground or a structure on earth, > some don't, especially at high altitude. Lightning is defined as a massive > electrostatic discharge between electrically charged regions within clouds, > or between a cloud and the Earth's surface. > > Pilots report lightning flashes which start and terminate in clouds without > ever going to ground. Presumably there are pockets of differing polarity at > altitude and occasionally will be aligned in such a way that the lightning > will come directly at the observer but be intercepted by the opposite > polarity before it hits the observer, with only the high energy radiation to > show for it. > > IOW - if the observer happened to be located in an airplane, so that both > pockets of charge were aligned in his line of sight, he might never see the > flash itself - only the radiation. The flash would be a small dot of light > which would not stand out like a bolt would. > > Note: this is NOT a claim of factuality - simply a "flash" suggestion, so to > speak. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Terry Blanton > http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/thunderstorms-contain- > dark-lightning-invisible-pulses-of-powerful-radiation/2013/04/08/1c796ebc-8a > 76-11e2-a051-6810d606108d_story.html > > > Sometimes its flashes are invisible, just sudden pulses of > unexpectedly powerful radiation. > > > > >
