did you ever read this... http://www.svn.net/krscfs/Black%20Holes%20as%20EVOs.pdf
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:59 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > This study linked "cosmic rays" to creating clouds. > > http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110824/full/news.2011.504.html > > I think the "cosmic rays" are micro black hole balls and strings removing > entropy/cooling the surrounding atmospheric gas and creating the clouds and > the electromagnetic charge(lightning) is created at the surface of the > particles/ strings. > > The solar wind is streaming entropy towards Earth at all different energy > levels. I think the sun is a Hydrogen collapser and string generator at > her nucleus. Sunspots are cooler than their surrounding gas due to those > strings. > > It is the quantum field we live in and it is lumpy and stringy and not > very smooth at all. > > Stewart > darkmattersalot.com > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:49 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Streamers sounds like "strings" to me. As in String Theory. I think >> they create the low pressure as they suck entropy at their surface. They >> also shred atoms at their surface creating the EV/ball of electrons and >> possibly positrons & neutrinos. You watch cirrus clouds closely, lots of >> little "streamers" proceeeding foul weather approaching, including ice >> halos, etc. >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Ken shoulders has discovered something he call a black EV(a ball of >>> electrons). >>> >>> The propagation of EVs through a gas atmosphere produces very thin, >>> bright ion streamers in the gas or along the wall of the envelope. In an >>> electrodeless device, other EVs may follow along the same sheath of an ion >>> streamer formed by a preceding EV. The thickness of the ion sheath >>> increases as multiple EVs propagate along the same streamer. If the gas >>> pressure is very low, EVs will propagate without the formation of a visible >>> streamer. Such are known as "black" EVs. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:23 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: >>> >>>> The study of this phenomena will be interesting. I can imagine that a >>>> large lightning discharge would be proceeded by many small unsuccessful >>>> attempts. I do not recall a rule that states that once a charge movement >>>> is initiated that it must continue to a large conclusion. Perhaps the >>>> dark lightning is one of these smaller events that does not involve enough >>>> current to be visible. >>>> >>>> For my hypothesis to be possible it is necessary for the electric >>>> field to vary within a thunder cloud. This seems like a reasonable >>>> assumption. You need a relatively short space between the positive and >>>> negative charge carriers where an intense electric field resides. This >>>> field might be modulated by nearby discharges that lead to local >>>> intensification. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >>>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>>> Sent: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 2:15 pm >>>> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Dark Lightning >>>> >>>> The first thing that came to mind for the missing bolt was Dirac >>>> "reciprocal >>>> space". Can lightning sometimes end up in reciprocal space? If so, it >>>> should >>>> be some kind of Fourier transform. This site turned up: >>>> http://www.rodenburg.org/theory/Reciprocalspace20.html >>>> >>>> ... which is interesting, but another site other may actually give us a >>>> better and mundane explanation: >>>> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/12/101223-lightning-x-rays-came >>>> ra-science-technology/ >>>> >>>> Which suggests that a lightning bolt carries almost all its x-ray radiation >>>> in its tip. >>>> >>>> Thus, if an observer saw only lots of x-rays and no flash of light, a >>>> plausible explanation is that the bolt was coming directing at the >>>> observer. >>>> Another observer located almost anywhere else far removed, could see the >>>> bolt from its side angle as a string-like bolt. But if that bolt is mostly >>>> in your line of sight, it would be mostly dark. >>>> >>>> OK, then why was the observer not fried by the bolt coming directly towards >>>> him - if the bolt was aligned in his direct line of sight? >>>> >>>> Although most lightning strikes do hit the ground or a structure on earth, >>>> some don't, especially at high altitude. Lightning is defined as a massive >>>> electrostatic discharge between electrically charged regions within clouds, >>>> or between a cloud and the Earth's surface. >>>> >>>> Pilots report lightning flashes which start and terminate in clouds without >>>> ever going to ground. Presumably there are pockets of differing polarity at >>>> altitude and occasionally will be aligned in such a way that the lightning >>>> will come directly at the observer but be intercepted by the opposite >>>> polarity before it hits the observer, with only the high energy radiation >>>> to >>>> show for it. >>>> >>>> IOW - if the observer happened to be located in an airplane, so that both >>>> pockets of charge were aligned in his line of sight, he might never see the >>>> flash itself - only the radiation. The flash would be a small dot of light >>>> which would not stand out like a bolt would. >>>> >>>> Note: this is NOT a claim of factuality - simply a "flash" suggestion, so >>>> to >>>> speak. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Terry Blanton >>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/thunderstorms-contain- >>>> dark-lightning-invisible-pulses-of-powerful-radiation/2013/04/08/1c796ebc-8a >>>> 76-11e2-a051-6810d606108d_story.html >>>> >>>> >>>> Sometimes its flashes are invisible, just sudden pulses of >>>> unexpectedly powerful radiation. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
