Streamers sounds like "strings" to me. As in String Theory. I think they create the low pressure as they suck entropy at their surface. They also shred atoms at their surface creating the EV/ball of electrons and possibly positrons & neutrinos. You watch cirrus clouds closely, lots of little "streamers" proceeeding foul weather approaching, including ice halos, etc.
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ken shoulders has discovered something he call a black EV(a ball of > electrons). > > The propagation of EVs through a gas atmosphere produces very thin, bright > ion streamers in the gas or along the wall of the envelope. In an > electrodeless device, other EVs may follow along the same sheath of an ion > streamer formed by a preceding EV. The thickness of the ion sheath > increases as multiple EVs propagate along the same streamer. If the gas > pressure is very low, EVs will propagate without the formation of a visible > streamer. Such are known as "black" EVs. > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:23 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: > >> The study of this phenomena will be interesting. I can imagine that a >> large lightning discharge would be proceeded by many small unsuccessful >> attempts. I do not recall a rule that states that once a charge movement >> is initiated that it must continue to a large conclusion. Perhaps the >> dark lightning is one of these smaller events that does not involve enough >> current to be visible. >> >> For my hypothesis to be possible it is necessary for the electric field >> to vary within a thunder cloud. This seems like a reasonable assumption. >> You need a relatively short space between the positive and negative charge >> carriers where an intense electric field resides. This field might be >> modulated by nearby discharges that lead to local intensification. >> >> Dave >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 2:15 pm >> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Dark Lightning >> >> The first thing that came to mind for the missing bolt was Dirac "reciprocal >> space". Can lightning sometimes end up in reciprocal space? If so, it should >> be some kind of Fourier transform. This site turned up: >> http://www.rodenburg.org/theory/Reciprocalspace20.html >> >> ... which is interesting, but another site other may actually give us a >> better and mundane explanation: >> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/12/101223-lightning-x-rays-came >> ra-science-technology/ >> >> Which suggests that a lightning bolt carries almost all its x-ray radiation >> in its tip. >> >> Thus, if an observer saw only lots of x-rays and no flash of light, a >> plausible explanation is that the bolt was coming directing at the observer. >> Another observer located almost anywhere else far removed, could see the >> bolt from its side angle as a string-like bolt. But if that bolt is mostly >> in your line of sight, it would be mostly dark. >> >> OK, then why was the observer not fried by the bolt coming directly towards >> him - if the bolt was aligned in his direct line of sight? >> >> Although most lightning strikes do hit the ground or a structure on earth, >> some don't, especially at high altitude. Lightning is defined as a massive >> electrostatic discharge between electrically charged regions within clouds, >> or between a cloud and the Earth's surface. >> >> Pilots report lightning flashes which start and terminate in clouds without >> ever going to ground. Presumably there are pockets of differing polarity at >> altitude and occasionally will be aligned in such a way that the lightning >> will come directly at the observer but be intercepted by the opposite >> polarity before it hits the observer, with only the high energy radiation to >> show for it. >> >> IOW - if the observer happened to be located in an airplane, so that both >> pockets of charge were aligned in his line of sight, he might never see the >> flash itself - only the radiation. The flash would be a small dot of light >> which would not stand out like a bolt would. >> >> Note: this is NOT a claim of factuality - simply a "flash" suggestion, so to >> speak. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Terry Blanton >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/thunderstorms-contain- >> dark-lightning-invisible-pulses-of-powerful-radiation/2013/04/08/1c796ebc-8a >> 76-11e2-a051-6810d606108d_story.html >> >> >> Sometimes its flashes are invisible, just sudden pulses of >> unexpectedly powerful radiation. >> >> >> >> >> >
