No, but thanks for posting

The problem I see "launching" a micro black hole/EV is that they are very
squirrly, like ball lightning and obey HUP and can change momentum fast.
 But if there are strings throughout this planet and possibly throughout
magnetic fields & solar winds, that will be our ticket to ride...

Stewart


On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:

> did you ever read this...
>
> http://www.svn.net/krscfs/Black%20Holes%20as%20EVOs.pdf
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:59 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This study linked "cosmic rays" to creating clouds.
>>
>> http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110824/full/news.2011.504.html
>>
>> I think the "cosmic rays" are micro black hole balls and strings removing
>> entropy/cooling the surrounding atmospheric gas and creating the clouds and
>> the electromagnetic charge(lightning) is created at the surface of the
>> particles/ strings.
>>
>> The solar wind is streaming entropy towards Earth at all different energy
>> levels.  I think the sun is a Hydrogen collapser and string generator at
>> her nucleus.  Sunspots are cooler than their surrounding gas due to those
>> strings.
>>
>> It is the quantum field we live in and it is lumpy and stringy and not
>> very smooth at all.
>>
>> Stewart
>> darkmattersalot.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:49 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Streamers sounds like "strings" to me.  As in String Theory.  I think
>>> they create the low pressure as they suck entropy at their surface.  They
>>> also shred atoms at their surface creating the EV/ball of electrons and
>>> possibly positrons & neutrinos.  You watch cirrus clouds closely, lots of
>>> little "streamers" proceeeding foul weather approaching, including ice
>>> halos, etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ken shoulders has discovered something he call a black EV(a ball of
>>>> electrons).
>>>>
>>>> The propagation of EVs through a gas atmosphere produces very thin,
>>>> bright ion streamers in the gas or along the wall of the envelope. In an
>>>> electrodeless device, other EVs may follow along the same sheath of an ion
>>>> streamer formed by a preceding EV. The thickness of the ion sheath
>>>> increases as multiple EVs propagate along the same streamer. If the gas
>>>> pressure is very low, EVs will propagate without the formation of a visible
>>>> streamer. Such are known as "black" EVs.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 3:23 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The study of this phenomena will be interesting.  I can imagine that a
>>>>> large lightning discharge would be proceeded by many small unsuccessful
>>>>> attempts.  I do not recall a rule that states that once a charge movement
>>>>> is initiated that it must continue to a large conclusion.   Perhaps the
>>>>> dark lightning is one of these smaller events that does not involve enough
>>>>> current to be visible.
>>>>>
>>>>>  For my hypothesis to be possible it is necessary for the electric
>>>>> field to vary within a thunder cloud.  This seems like a reasonable
>>>>> assumption.  You need a relatively short space between the positive and
>>>>> negative charge carriers where an intense electric field resides.  This
>>>>> field might be modulated by nearby discharges that lead to local
>>>>> intensification.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Dave
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>
>>>>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>>>>> Sent: Wed, Apr 10, 2013 2:15 pm
>>>>> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Dark Lightning
>>>>>
>>>>>  The first thing that came to mind for the missing bolt was Dirac 
>>>>> "reciprocal
>>>>> space". Can lightning sometimes end up in reciprocal space? If so, it 
>>>>> should
>>>>> be some kind of Fourier transform. This site turned up:
>>>>> http://www.rodenburg.org/theory/Reciprocalspace20.html
>>>>>
>>>>> ... which is interesting, but another site other may actually give us a
>>>>> better and mundane explanation:
>>>>> http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/12/101223-lightning-x-rays-came
>>>>> ra-science-technology/
>>>>>
>>>>> Which suggests that a lightning bolt carries almost all its x-ray 
>>>>> radiation
>>>>> in its tip.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thus, if an observer saw only lots of x-rays and no flash of light, a
>>>>> plausible explanation is that the bolt was coming directing at the 
>>>>> observer.
>>>>> Another observer located almost anywhere else far removed, could see the
>>>>> bolt from its side angle as a string-like bolt. But if that bolt is mostly
>>>>> in your line of sight, it would be mostly dark.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, then why was the observer not fried by the bolt coming directly 
>>>>> towards
>>>>> him - if the bolt was aligned in his direct line of sight?
>>>>>
>>>>> Although most lightning strikes do hit the ground or a structure on earth,
>>>>> some don't, especially at high altitude. Lightning is defined as a massive
>>>>> electrostatic discharge between electrically charged regions within 
>>>>> clouds,
>>>>> or between a cloud and the Earth's surface.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pilots report lightning flashes which start and terminate in clouds 
>>>>> without
>>>>> ever going to ground. Presumably there are pockets of differing polarity 
>>>>> at
>>>>> altitude and occasionally will be aligned in such a way that the lightning
>>>>> will come directly at the observer but be intercepted by the opposite
>>>>> polarity before it hits the observer, with only the high energy radiation 
>>>>> to
>>>>> show for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> IOW - if the observer happened to be located in an airplane, so that both
>>>>> pockets of charge were aligned in his line of sight, he might never see 
>>>>> the
>>>>> flash itself - only the radiation. The flash would be a small dot of light
>>>>> which would not stand out like a bolt would.
>>>>>
>>>>> Note: this is NOT a claim of factuality - simply a "flash" suggestion, so 
>>>>> to
>>>>> speak.
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Terry Blanton
>>>>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/thunderstorms-contain-
>>>>> dark-lightning-invisible-pulses-of-powerful-radiation/2013/04/08/1c796ebc-8a
>>>>> 76-11e2-a051-6810d606108d_story.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sometimes its flashes are invisible, just sudden pulses of
>>>>> unexpectedly powerful radiation.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to