John You may want to start collecting information from those that do respond to you. Blue sky, but If you could get Genetic information you might be able to identify certain correlations between images/structures and the people who feel them. Or focus on those with strong reactions. I suspect that you have developed quite a few images, could you send me all you have available? No indications of active or inactive, just numbered. I'll set things up at my lab to do a blind study. If you could give pantone numbers for the colors you use, I could have them printed by a local printer to exact specification, and checked "blind" across as many people as I can expose to them.
Do you have any data regarding how far away a person can feel effects of various images? Any that can be felt further away? My thinking here is that piling them one on top of the other might affect each other. Aether does permeate everything and so shielding or isolating them could be an issue. Hence the questions about distance. I may have to bring cards into range one at a time. Gibson ________________________________ From: John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:09 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Any experimenters, aether theorists here? Subtle changes in the image and it would be very different. Ok, here, I made 2 images, I wanted them to look almost identical, one is active and one isn't, I just went ahead and labeled them, so if you wanted a blind test no luck. http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/9209/activeandinactive.png I was limited as to what I could do to keep the images similar in form, but make one strong and the other off. If the effects was simply due to seeing some vague representation of an Ahnk then both images have that. Now this is not the best image to start with, and not the best if your ability to feel any effect is marginal, but worth a shot. The image is very sensitive to any manipulation of colours, so if your monitor or videocard is set to vivid, or has a gamma correction, brightness or contrast or other manipulation so the exact colour values aren't delivered, this entire image could be quite relatively inactive. I will work on an image suitable for scale testing, face up and face down might be imperfect especially because once energized it can retain some activity despite reduced lighting. but a boost is observed from turning a light on. John On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: These are very unusual images. They do elicit emotion. > >Some of that could be based on similarities to known symbolism as opposed to an aether effect, but then again, that symbolism itself may derive from some kind of primitive understanding of the way that optical images interact with brain neutrons. The “shooter” is reminiscent of Navaho art and the latest/strongest to Egyptian imagery. > >I shrunk the second one down to get 9 on a page, then printed cut and stacked the images to see if there was anything which showed up on a gram scale (comparing face up to face down). There was nothing objective, but I am using a laser printer so the color did not contribute. > >Jones > >From:John Berry > >Has no one tried it yet? > > >And a 3rd image to try to feel, this contains recent development with some previous ones. >http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/6251/rotational.png > >All in an effort to reduce the odds of having people report they don't feel anything. > >Again, best in a dark room (but not required). > >Feel for any sensations. > >http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/1139/lateststrongest4.png > >http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/6029/shooterv54.png > > >
