What would be an acceptable control experiment that could distinguish between placebo and real effect? What about double blind?
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:13 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Let me add that I also know that this has nothing to do with visual > effects because this is only one form I have used to effect the aether. > > It started when I made a coil a bit over a year ago, I could very very > faintly at first feel something in my hand. > It was near the level of imagination at first, but it became more apparent > as the energy gathered in my hand until it was undeniable. > > I thought it might have had a conventional explanation until I found it > worked for a few minutes after turning the power off. > > I learnt more and made one that needed no power and was stronger, I tested > it on people and found a majority could feel it. > > I have since made many more coils and had about 200+ people feel a > sensation (over 90%, often about 97%, occasionally a lower percentage feel > it, but always a majority). > > I have made audio files that use some of the principles I found to get > computer speakers to make the energy (sometimes it is not the sound but the > EM from the speakers that effects the aether). > > And I have done a lot of work with images since they can effect the aether > just fine, but have many many advantages. > > So if it was just an effect with the mind, then these same principles > would not work when in coil form hidden from sight in a tube, but it works > fine. > > So before you write this off as some bio-sensory trick, give it a try. > Why wouldn't light effect the medium in which it has it's existence? > Really by definition it must. Well, it does. > > > John > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:14 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> This is not made to effect the eye or brain. >> It works with eyes closed. >> As do images that look like a solid colour to the eyes, they still work >> (due to subtle colour variation the eye can't make out). >> >> If you put the 'shooter' image on screen and feel the right side of the >> screen from the back or not looking at the screen, the energy can still be >> felt. >> Having said that, it depends on the persons sensitivity. >> >> Some people can't feel it in their palms, but enough can. >> >> If you don't believe me, here is a radical idea, try it. >> Stick the image on screen and feel at the 'output' of the shooter image >> and see if you can feel something (likely subtle, a breeze, a cool, a >> warmth, a tingle, something), then try without being able to see the image. >> >> >> John >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Roarty, Francis X < >> francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: >> >>> John,**** >>> >>> Eye candy, vertigo and mood alteration are certainly examples of light >>> patterns affecting the brain through optical stimulation but I would not >>> qualify this as engineering the ether. It is an interesting subject but I >>> disagree with you titling this subject as based on ether theory.**** >>> >>> Regards**** >>> >>> Fran**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> *From:* John Berry [mailto:berry.joh...@gmail.com] >>> *Sent:* Thursday, April 18, 2013 4:05 AM >>> >>> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >>> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Any experimenters, aether theorists here?* >>> *** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Harry, thanks for your appreciation.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> But it isn't about drawings.**** >>> >>> Sure, that is the option I have selected to share since it is sooo easy >>> to replicate.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> I can also make sound files that create energy that can be felt.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> And programs**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> And videos, but the easiest to share is images.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> I can share coils, I can share electrical circuits.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> It is about breaking into a new realm of physics that makes much more >>> extraordinary technology possible.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> So who is interested? >>> So far no one new has apparently tried to feel the energy.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> I thought the only reason to be here was interests in breakthrough >>> discoveries in science that change what is possible, it seems however that >>> there are very very few even willing to dip their toe in the water.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> John**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Harry Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> Thanks for positing this. >>> It is about drawing the world into existence.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Newton drew a clock-work universe into existence using geometry and the >>> tools of a mechanical draftsmen.**** >>> >>> "...geometry is founded in mechanical practice, and is nothing but that >>> part of universal mechanics which accurately proposes and demonstrates the >>> art of measuring." --from the preface to Principia **** >>> >>> >>> >>> Today, we don't have to confine ourselves to mechanical practices when >>> drawing geometry so we can draw different worlds into existence.**** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> Harry**** >>> >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> **** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:56 AM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> And a 3rd image to try to feel, this contains recent development with >>> some previous ones.**** >>> >>> http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/6251/rotational.png**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> All in an effort to reduce the odds of having people report they don't >>> feel anything.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Again, best in a dark room (but not required).**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> Feel for any sensations.**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:43 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> A worthwhile improvement for both images:**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> http://img822.imageshack.us/img822/1139/lateststrongest4.png**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/6029/shooterv54.png**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:32 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote:**** >>> >>> I sent the wrong image by mistake, the first link should have been this >>> one:**** >>> >>> http://img823.imageshack.us/img823/4411/thelateststrongest2.png**** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >>> ** ** >>> >> >> >
