James, I have no idea what you mean to say here. No conspiracy is involved or implied. The effect of LENR on the world's economy is obvious to anyone who understands economics. This is reality, not some proposed crazy idea.

On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:46 AM, James Bowery wrote:

The homeostatic mechanisms of these systems embody a kind of intelligence that is all-too-frequently attributed to "conspiracy". This is complicated by the fact that genuine conspiratorial behavior is sometimes involved. It is further complicated by the vague definition of "conspiracy" as the word is used in rhetorical conflict. I find it helpful to think of these homeostatic mechanisms as a kind of intelligence that is so alien to human intelligence that we have difficulty conceptualizing it. In this respect it is similar to our difficulty in conceptualizing the homeostatic mechanisms of our own bodies that include incredibly sophisticated systems such as immune response.

If we could somehow get a better conceptual handle on the structure of these mechanisms it might become practical to disrupt them so that progress can proceed.


On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: Of course LENR is denied by the West. The technology is a real and profound danger to the West. It would undermine the economics of the energy industries, on which the West is built, and it would give the Third world, including China and India, great advantage. The people in charge in the West may seem stupid in their policies, but they are fully aware of the danger LENR represents. The West will be forced to accept the technology eventually, but not because an intelligent approach was used to develop and take advantage of the technology. No, they will have to accept the working generators built in and controlled by China or some other country, such as Sweden. LENR not only has the ability to make energy cheaper but it will, in the process, change the power structure of the world, just as discovery of atomic weapons did. This subject may be a fun intellectual game to scientists; it is a life and death issue to some industries and social structures.


On Sep 23, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:

Did you notice that Cold fusion was treated much more in a balanced way in Chinese and japanese .

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B8%B8%E6%B8%A9%E6%A0%B8%E8%9E%8D%E5%90%88
translated:
http://translate.google.fr/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fja.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%E5%B8%B8%E6%B8%A9%E6%A0%B8%E8%9E%8D%E5%90%88


http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%86%B7%E6%A0%B8%E8%81%9A%E5%8F%98
translated:
http://translate.google.fr/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fzh.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%E5%86%B7%E6%A0%B8%E8%81%9A%E5%8F%98

lenr-canr is not blacklisted, and you find reference to many positions.

what does it inspire you?

is LENR denial a western problem?



Reply via email to