James, I have no idea what you mean to say here. No conspiracy is
involved or implied. The effect of LENR on the world's economy is
obvious to anyone who understands economics. This is reality, not some
proposed crazy idea.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:46 AM, James Bowery wrote:
The homeostatic mechanisms of these systems embody a kind of
intelligence that is all-too-frequently attributed to "conspiracy".
This is complicated by the fact that genuine conspiratorial behavior
is sometimes involved. It is further complicated by the vague
definition of "conspiracy" as the word is used in rhetorical
conflict. I find it helpful to think of these homeostatic
mechanisms as a kind of intelligence that is so alien to human
intelligence that we have difficulty conceptualizing it. In this
respect it is similar to our difficulty in conceptualizing the
homeostatic mechanisms of our own bodies that include incredibly
sophisticated systems such as immune response.
If we could somehow get a better conceptual handle on the structure
of these mechanisms it might become practical to disrupt them so
that progress can proceed.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Edmund Storms
<stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
Of course LENR is denied by the West. The technology is a real and
profound danger to the West. It would undermine the economics of the
energy industries, on which the West is built, and it would give the
Third world, including China and India, great advantage. The people
in charge in the West may seem stupid in their policies, but they
are fully aware of the danger LENR represents. The West will be
forced to accept the technology eventually, but not because an
intelligent approach was used to develop and take advantage of the
technology. No, they will have to accept the working generators
built in and controlled by China or some other country, such as
Sweden. LENR not only has the ability to make energy cheaper but it
will, in the process, change the power structure of the world, just
as discovery of atomic weapons did. This subject may be a fun
intellectual game to scientists; it is a life and death issue to
some industries and social structures.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote:
Did you notice that Cold fusion was treated much more in a balanced
way in Chinese and japanese .
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B8%B8%E6%B8%A9%E6%A0%B8%E8%9E%8D%E5%90%88
translated:
http://translate.google.fr/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fja.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%E5%B8%B8%E6%B8%A9%E6%A0%B8%E8%9E%8D%E5%90%88
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%86%B7%E6%A0%B8%E8%81%9A%E5%8F%98
translated:
http://translate.google.fr/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fzh.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%E5%86%B7%E6%A0%B8%E8%81%9A%E5%8F%98
lenr-canr is not blacklisted, and you find reference to many
positions.
what does it inspire you?
is LENR denial a western problem?
