Sorry, Ed, I should have clarified that I wasn't referring to you as having posited a conspiracy theory. My abstractions may have been a bit too for the present conversation...
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > James, I have no idea what you mean to say here. No conspiracy is involved > or implied. The effect of LENR on the world's economy is obvious to anyone > who understands economics. This is reality, not some proposed crazy idea. > > > On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:46 AM, James Bowery wrote: > > The homeostatic mechanisms of these systems embody a kind of intelligence > that is all-too-frequently attributed to "conspiracy". This is complicated > by the fact that genuine conspiratorial behavior is sometimes involved. It > is further complicated by the vague definition of "conspiracy" as the word > is used in rhetorical conflict. I find it helpful to think of these > homeostatic mechanisms as a kind of intelligence that is so alien to human > intelligence that we have difficulty conceptualizing it. In this respect > it is similar to our difficulty in conceptualizing the homeostatic > mechanisms of our own bodies that include incredibly sophisticated systems > such as immune response. > > If we could somehow get a better conceptual handle on the structure of > these mechanisms it might become practical to disrupt them so that progress > can proceed. > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com>wrote: > >> Of course LENR is denied by the West. The technology is a real and >> profound danger to the West. It would undermine the economics of the energy >> industries, on which the West is built, and it would give the Third world, >> including China and India, great advantage. The people in charge in the >> West may seem stupid in their policies, but they are fully aware of the >> danger LENR represents. The West will be forced to accept the technology >> eventually, but not because an intelligent approach was used to develop and >> take advantage of the technology. No, they will have to accept the working >> generators built in and controlled by China or some other country, such as >> Sweden. LENR not only has the ability to make energy cheaper but it will, >> in the process, change the power structure of the world, just as discovery >> of atomic weapons did. This subject may be a fun intellectual game to >> scientists; it is a life and death issue to some industries and social >> structures. >> >> >> On Sep 23, 2013, at 3:52 AM, Alain Sepeda wrote: >> >> Did you notice that Cold fusion was treated much more in a balanced way >> in Chinese and japanese . >> >> >> https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B8%B8%E6%B8%A9%E6%A0%B8%E8%9E%8D%E5%90%88 >> translated: >> >> http://translate.google.fr/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fja.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%E5%B8%B8%E6%B8%A9%E6%A0%B8%E8%9E%8D%E5%90%88 >> >> >> http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%86%B7%E6%A0%B8%E8%81%9A%E5%8F%98<https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%86%B7%E6%A0%B8%E8%81%9A%E5%8F%98> >> >> translated: >> >> http://translate.google.fr/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fzh.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2F%E5%86%B7%E6%A0%B8%E8%81%9A%E5%8F%98 >> >> lenr-canr is not blacklisted, and you find reference to many positions. >> >> what does it inspire you? >> >> is LENR denial a western problem? >> >> >> > >
