I agree, I believe we are bioelectrochemical beings of frequency. MS, which is another autoimmune disease, clustered on the Faroe Islands the same time when the Allies installed military microwave radars.
http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/06/i-am-faroely-certain-its-the-microwave-radars/ Too many coincidences. On Monday, May 12, 2014, H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > It is time to get beyond heating as the only way for brain damage to > occur. If the brain functions like an electrical communication network, > then it is possible to disrupt the network by means that don't require > heating. > > Harry > > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:44 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: > > Much depends upon how your mechanism causes the harm. If heat is the > problem, then the average power is important. Microwave cooking depends > upon heating to prepare the meal. The instantaneous peak power might be > able to ignite a fast acting explosive material or cause a bulb to ionize, > but the average energy is what is detected by the radar receiving system. > > When you perform your analysis of the damage due to radar transmitters, > are you able to determine how well centered the effect is about the > device? Another consideration is that the antenna pattern is generally > directed above the ground level for a large distance. Many folks have > expressed deep concern for the effects of cellular radio towers due to > misunderstandings about radio power levels. It is generally easy to worry > about issues that involves "black magic" when dealing with the public since > people tend to seek simple explanations to their perceived problems > especially when random events seem to defy understanding. > > ChemE, I have no idea about how well you have performed your analysis of > the radar environmental damages that you are following. I assume that you > have also included research which would prove that the lack of a tower > always shows none of the degradation expected due to RF. What is the > signal to noise level that you are working with? Are you confident that > you could take a random sample of sites, some with radars and some without, > and pick the active ones every time? > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 9:50 am > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio > > David, > > To say it in another way, you can average the power in Mike Tyson's > punch over one minute and say that it is low average power when in fact it > knocked you on your ass in a fraction of a second. That is the error in > judgement I believe the radar physorcists have made and we are all paying > dearly for. Think of mama and the baby on a hillside deck getting swept by > those pulses 5 or 6 times a minute and you will understand what I mean. > What if time did not exist like Einstein and others have claimed and you > could not average that pulse over time??? What would you do then? > > > These are the NEXRAD WSR-88 "Standard" Doppler Weather Radar Specs > (there are ~150 of these in service in the US). Due to the higher gain they > have more power density @ 10 km than an ASR-9 radar. > > Radar/Call SignFFC ModelWSR-88DMax Pulsed Power (Watts)1000000Gain (dBi) > 45.5Frequency (MHz)2,850.0RPM6.0 Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km 112.9Pulse > Duration(uSec)1.6Pulse Repition Factor (Hz)800Range Est. (Miles)143 > Latitude33.36358856 Longitude-84.56607328FIPS13113CountyFayetteStateGA > Comments/SourceUpgraded to Dual Pol in 2010-2012 > > > These are the Airport TDWR "Standard" Doppler Weather Radar Specs (There > are ~ 50 of these in service) > > TDWR 5615 MHzModelTDWRMax Pulsed Power (Watts)250,000Gain (dBi)50Frequency > (MHz)5,575 RPM5Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km79.58Pulse Duration(uSec) > 1.1 > >
