FYI, For anyone interested, I will be discussing the Kauai Coral Reef disease and nearby Pulsed Microwave Doppler Radars tomorrow night @ 11 PM ET with the local marine biologist on Hawaiian Talk Radio (5-6 PM Kauai Time). It streams off their website
[image: hitomorrowheader] http://hawaiistomorrow.com/ Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:14 AM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: > For wildlife it appears to be increased hypoxia effects within a 15 > mile radius. It is strongly correlated with the total power level/number > of overlapping radars. > > My p-value stats looked at 59 radar towers and 2 years of fish kills > (>1000) due to hypoxia/algae blooms. It compared them to 59 random/coastal > locations. > > Melbourne, Florida is the 27th largest town but happens to have the most > radars and tremendous disease problem in the lagoon. > > Many of the mammal necropsies are showing signs of shock > > > http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2014-02-01/news/os-manatee-deaths-indian-river-20140201_1_indian-river-lagoon-katie-tripp-dead-manatees > > Sort of like Dave building his transmitter and confusing power with > energy.... > > Power(joules/sec) * duration (secs) = Energy (joules) > > Power <> Energy > > Water = Energy > Flowrate of water = Power > > Fire hose on for 1/2 second knocks you on your ass using little energy but > lots of power. > > NOAA does not know the difference. I think it is killing us one > DNA/RNA strand at a time along with free radical/oxidative stress in our > blood streams, just like the waterways. > > Take your anti-oxidants and eat fruits and vegetables! > > > > > > On Tuesday, May 13, 2014, MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net> wrote: > >> ChemE, >> >> What is the avg radius of detrimental health effects around the Doppler >> stations? >> >> -mark >> >> >> >> *From:* ChemE Stewart [mailto:cheme...@gmail.com] >> *Sent:* Monday, May 12, 2014 4:29 PM >> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject:* [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio >> >> >> >> Bob, agreed. I told the biologist that is running statistics that I think >> the microwave radars may be breaking RNA/DNA strands and triggering single >> stranded RNA viruses like norovirus outbreaks on cruise ships. >> >> >> >> http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/27/were-cooked/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Dave-- >> >> >> >> One possible effect is the resonant absorbtion of radiation by >> biologically active molecules, which cause ionization and destruction of >> the molecules. This is particularly damaging when the molecule is a DNA or >> RNA molecule. Weak H bonds occur in these molecules and such destruction >> leads to modified DNA or RNA activity. The average heating idea also is >> appropriate, however it is not as much as a problem as the destruction or >> disabling of the large molecules that control the body's production of >> other complex molecules. DNA in skin and eye cells would be more >> susceptible than those more deeply situated in the body. Reproductive >> organs near the surface of the body are more venerable to such radiation >> and hence to genetic changes that are passed on to offspring. Such a >> problem applies to humans as well a smaller animals and birds that have the >> least amount of shielding of their gonads. >> >> >> >> The other issue associated with DNA destruction could be the stimulated >> emission of tritium by the exposure to the intense radiation of the >> radars. Tritium is a bad actor when it decays in a nucleus of a cell. The >> beta from the tritium is about 18 Kev. This energy is deposited over a >> path of about 6 microns. The average dimension of a cell nucleus is about >> 6 to 10 microns. This means a large fraction of the beta from tritium >> decay is deposited in the nucleus where it is bound to cause numerous >> double breaks of DNA molecules and the genetic damage that goes along with >> these breaks. Such mutagenic effects were observed in the vole population >> around Chernobyl after the nuclear accident as a result of tritium >> contamination in the drinking water consumed by the vole population. >> >> >> >> (Considering the damage to gene cells of the body, the EPA drinking water >> standard for tritium, 20,000 pico curies per liter, is way to high (about >> 100 times) to prevent unreasonable damage to gene cells. Small breeding >> populations of animals, including some populations of humans, can be >> unreasonably affected by such high bodily tritium concentrations as allowed >> by the current standards. The justification by the EPA and the ICRP that >> any defects in the genetics passed on to the society get greatly diluted to >> reduce risk, does not apply to small breeding populations. And of course, >> if you are one in a million of the people at risk that develop a health >> problem that is non-mutagenic , it does not help you at all.) >> >> >> >> I am one to believe that there should be no risk to vertebrates, except >> birds, existing around hazards that causes more than one health effect of >> the population subjected to the hazard. Important insects such as bees >> should be included in this no risk criteria. >> >> >> >> Bob >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >>
