Much depends upon how your mechanism causes the harm. If heat is the problem, then the average power is important. Microwave cooking depends upon heating to prepare the meal. The instantaneous peak power might be able to ignite a fast acting explosive material or cause a bulb to ionize, but the average energy is what is detected by the radar receiving system.
When you perform your analysis of the damage due to radar transmitters, are you able to determine how well centered the effect is about the device? Another consideration is that the antenna pattern is generally directed above the ground level for a large distance. Many folks have expressed deep concern for the effects of cellular radio towers due to misunderstandings about radio power levels. It is generally easy to worry about issues that involves "black magic" when dealing with the public since people tend to seek simple explanations to their perceived problems especially when random events seem to defy understanding. ChemE, I have no idea about how well you have performed your analysis of the radar environmental damages that you are following. I assume that you have also included research which would prove that the lack of a tower always shows none of the degradation expected due to RF. What is the signal to noise level that you are working with? Are you confident that you could take a random sample of sites, some with radars and some without, and pick the active ones every time? Dave -----Original Message----- From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 9:50 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio David, To say it in another way, you can average the power in Mike Tyson's punch over one minute and say that it is low average power when in fact it knocked you on your ass in a fraction of a second. That is the error in judgement I believe the radar physorcists have made and we are all paying dearly for. Think of mama and the baby on a hillside deck getting swept by those pulses 5 or 6 times a minute and you will understand what I mean. What if time did not exist like Einstein and others have claimed and you could not average that pulse over time??? What would you do then? These are the NEXRAD WSR-88 "Standard" Doppler Weather Radar Specs (there are ~150 of these in service in the US). Due to the higher gain they have more power density @ 10 km than an ASR-9 radar. Radar/Call Sign FFC Model WSR-88D Max Pulsed Power (Watts) 1000000 Gain (dBi) 45.5 Frequency (MHz) 2,850.0 RPM 6.0 Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km 112.9 Pulse Duration(uSec) 1.6 Pulse Repition Factor (Hz) 800 Range Est. (Miles) 143 Latitude 33.36358856 Longitude -84.56607328 FIPS 13113 County Fayette State GA Comments/Source Upgraded to Dual Pol in 2010-2012 These are the Airport TDWR "Standard" Doppler Weather Radar Specs (There are ~ 50 of these in service) TDWR 5615 MHz Model TDWR Max Pulsed Power (Watts) 250,000 Gain (dBi) 50 Frequency (MHz) 5,575 RPM 5 Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km 79.58 Pulse Duration(uSec) 1.1 Pulse Repition Factor (Hz) 2000 Range Est. (Miles) 56 Latitude 33.64659872 Longitude -84.26191362 FIPS 13151 County Henry State GA On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:01 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: The specifications for the radar system below are typical of a pulsed radar system and not what I would expect from a standard Doppler radar. The duty cycle appears to be .1% for the unit listed whereas a Doppler radar is CW. The average power is 1300 watts of RF into the antenna, I assume. The gain of the antenna may be 34 dB relative to an isotropic radiator. Someone might be thinking of a pulsed Doppler radar which measures the change in transmit frequency of the returning pulses to get target velocity information. That type of radar is not a standard Doppler. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sun, May 11, 2014 9:18 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio Stewart, I have glanced at your web site. I have not taken a close look at your research, but I would not be surprised if you ended up being onto something about doppler radar being a source of hypoxia, oxygen free radicals and the death of nearby animal and plant life. You also have a theory of dark matter, and a hunch that dark matter is indirectly responsible for the conclusions concerning doppler radar that you arrive at in your informal research. On the connection to dark matter, I personally have no opinion. I am skeptical, however, that your research is sufficient to establish any kind of linkage between the effects of doppler radar and dark matter, however. In light of this doubt, I think you might be able to get your investigation into doppler radar out to a wider audience if you did not combine it with the question of dark matter. Adding dark matter into the mix asks too much of people in their suspension of disbelief for them to be able to give much credibility to your doppler radar hunch, even if both hunches ended up being true. Eric On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:55 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> wrote: Radar/Call Sign MHT Model ASR-9 Max Pulsed Power (Watts) 1,300,000 Gain (dBi) 34 Frequency (MHz) 2,800 RPM 12.5 Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km 10.39 Pulse Duration(uSec) 1.00 Pulse Repition Factor (Hz) 1,000 Range Est. (Miles) 60 Latitude 42.937248 Longitude -71.437286 FIPS 33011 County Hillsborough State NH
