To answer your second question, if you see a lot of dead stuff and diseased biology and fish dying due to reoccuring hypoxia, there will be high powered, pulsed microwave radars nearby with local peak power greater than 10 W/m2. ALL of our radar bases have chronic wasting in wildlife surrounding them:
Pacific Sands Cape Canaveral Guam White Sands Colorado Springs Just search for the names on my blog and you will find the research. I hope you find the time. "Trust me, I know the difference between power and energy. I have designed a number of transmitters in the past and been cooked by a few of them! " SEE, THAT IS BECAUSE YOU HAD THE WRONG EQUATION, IT IS PEAK, NOT AVERAGE. :) On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:52 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > ChemE, > > You can operate the radar at that power level in a continuous mode and it > does work. The pulse mode has several advantages since reception can take > place during the time that the transmitter stands by and offers no > interference. Check out the RADAR range equation and you will see that it > is based upon average power and not peak. This is because many pulses are > averaged together from a target to allow the noise to be reduced. > > Trust me, I know the difference between power and energy. I have designed > a number of transmitters in the past and been cooked by a few of them! You > are correct in assuming that I have not spent time researching the subject > that you are most interested in and therefore I can not comment upon how > you carried out the research to make your conclusions. I just caution you > to use the proper control techniques to ensure accuracy, especially when > your observations appear to conflict with most others. > > If you have an opportunity I would like to have one question answered so > that I might become more interested in your research. Can you clearly show > that a random location can be analyzed by your technique and the correct > decision made as to whether or not a transmitter is located there? In > other words, are there false positives or false negatives? My plate if > fairly full at the moment and I have to restrict the subjects that I can > follow. If you have followed proper controls and the effect remains well > above the noise I will find time to study your ideas as it become available. > > Dave > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 1:43 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio > > David, > > I have been researching these radars for approx. 1 year and diseased > biology for 1 1/2 years. > > When you converted that instantaneous high power pulse to a one second > average you are basically confusing power with energy, which is WRONG. If > it was correct then why not operate your radar continuously at an average > power of 1500 watts? BECAUSE THEY WON'T work. > > As far as I can tell you have done very little research. If you really > want to do some and not just talk like a radio guy, I suggest you read the > following and the referenced research papers, many peer reviewed. > > This: > http://www.scopemed.org/?jft=65&ft=65-1394615302#abstract > > And This: > http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/05/03/power-to-the-people/ > > http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/13/autism-emf/ > > And this: > > http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/03/13/its-the-same-frequency-range-why-would-you-expect-the-results-to-be-different/ > > And this: > http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/01/12/florida-2/ > > And this: > http://sdsimonson.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/11-4-13-florida1.png > > And this: > http://sdsimonson.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/fish-kills-statistics.png > > And this: > http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/03/05/quick-everybody-rush-to-florida/ > > And This: > http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/24/a-shocking-discovery/ > > And also look at the 300 hundred or so epidemiology maps I have placed > on my blog and the 900 posts over the past two years and then get back to > me OK?? > > I am just wondering why 1/68 kids in the US now have autism, 50 million > people in the US now have an auto-immune disease and all of our f&^%ing > wildlife is suffering AND NOBODY SEEMS TO KNOW WHY > > Oh, and read this and get back to me in a month, once you have actually > done some of your own research, OK? > [image: Doppler Radar] > > > > > > On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:13 PM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: > >> ChemE, >> >> You need to research these systems. Each transmitter is far lower than >> the powers you list and they are not correlated in time or frequency. >> From what I recall the dangers associated with this type of radiation has >> never been shown to be significant. >> >> >> Dave >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >> Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 11:17 am >> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio >> >> David, >> >> It is not heating. It is the electromagnetic discharge of the >> instantaneous pulses of microwave radiation. >> >> Cell towers are typically 20,000 to 50,000 watts. Read this letter >> >> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/us_doi_comments.pdf >> >> Radiation Impacts and Categorical Exclusions >> >> "There is a growing level of anecdotal evidence linking effects of >> non-thermal, non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation from communication >> towers on nesting and roosting wild birds and other wildlife in the U.S. >> Independent, third-party studies have yet to be conducted in the U.S. or >> Canada, >> although a peer-reviewed research protocol developed for the U.S. Forest >> Service by the Service's Division of Migratory Bird Management is >> available to study both collision and radiation impacts (Manville 2002). As >> previously mentioned, Balmori (2005) found strong negative correlations >> between levels of tower-emitted microwave radiation and bird breeding, >> nesting, and roosting in the vicinity of electromagnetic fields in >> Spain. He documented nest and site abandonment, plumage deterioration, >> locomotion problems, reduced survivorship, and death in House Sparrows, >> White Storks, Rock Doves, Magpies, Collared Doves, and other species. >> Though these species had historically been documented to roost and nest >> in these areas, Balmori (2005) did not observe these symptoms prior to >> construction and operation of the cellular phone towers. Balmori and Hallberg >> (2007) and Everaert and Bauwens (2007) found similar strong negative >> correlations among male House Sparrows. Under laboratory 'conditions, >> DiCarlo et al. (2002) raised troubling concerns about impacts of >> low-level, non-thermal electromagnetic radiation from the standard 915 >> MHz cell phone frequency on domestic chicken embryos- with some lethal >> results (Manville 2009). *Given the findings of the studies mentioned >> above, field studies should be **conducted in North America to validate >> potential impacts of communication tower radiation both direct and indirect >> - to migratory birds and other trust wildlife species."* >> >> >> >> 50-100 times the normal incidence of "motor-neuron"/ALS around the >> Guam radar station >> >> http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/04/04/guilefulguamguano/ >> The motor neuron diseases (MNDs) are a group of progressive >> neurological disorders that destroy motor neurons, the cells that control >> essential voluntary muscle activity such as speaking, walking, breathing, >> and swallowing. Normally, messages from nerve cells in the brain (called >> *upper >> motor neurons*) are transmitted to nerve cells in the brain stem and >> spinal cord (called *lower motor neurons*) and from them to particular >> muscles. Upper motor neurons direct the lower motor neurons to produce >> movements such as walking or chewing. Lower motor neurons control movement >> in the arms, legs, chest, face, throat, and tongue. Spinal motor neurons >> are also called anterior horn cells. Upper motor neurons are also called >> corticospinal neurons. >> When there are disruptions in the signals between the lowest motor >> neurons and the muscle, the muscles do not work properly; the muscles >> gradually weaken and may begin wasting away and develop uncontrollable >> twitching (called*fasciculations*). When there are disruptions in the >> signals between the upper motor neurons and the lower motor neurons, the >> limb muscles develop stiffness (called *spasticity*), movements become >> slow and effortful, and tendon reflexes such as knee and ankle jerks become >> overactive. Over time, the ability to control voluntary movement can be >> lost. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:57 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com>wrote: >> >>> Radar systems detect the target based upon the average power incident >>> upon it. This is due to the continuous behavior of noise which tends to >>> mask the signal. Heating of the target becomes averaged out during the >>> complete period of the base pulse which in this case is about 1 milisecond. >>> >>> Of course, the reflected wave must be generated by instantaneous >>> currents on the target surface as you suggest. If the problem you are >>> analyzing occurs during the 1 microsecond time frame then it is quite >>> possible for it to be demonstrated. The skin effect also comes into >>> consideration at the high RF frequencies which tends to reduce penetration >>> of the signal into the target. Better conductivity of the material >>> decreases the dept rapidly. >>> >>> A true Doppler radar would have the full heating effect due to the RF >>> maximum power level as long as the antenna pattern illuminates the target >>> you are considering. Also, the pulsed radar pattern of the radar mentioned >>> impacts upon your desired target for a small portion of the dish rotation >>> time. The average target heating must be adjusted accordingly. >>> >>> I do not understand the nature of the damage that you are considering >>> with your research. If it is associated with the average heating as with a >>> microwave oven then the pulse duty cycle, etc. needs to be integrated into >>> the equations. My comments earlier were directed toward clarifying the >>> difference between a true Doppler radar and a more of less standard pulsed >>> system. >>> >>> Dave >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com> >>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> Sent: Mon, May 12, 2014 7:17 am >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio >>> >>> David, the ASR-9 is an airport survellience radar. That is correct >>> about the gain, weather/military doppler radar gains are 45-50 dbi, more >>> focused dishes. The instantaneous pulses are > 1,000,000 watts but they >>> are only on for 1/1000 of each second. Does nature average that high power >>> pulse over 1 second like you are doing? And if it does, how does nature do >>> that? Does it induce instantaneous electrical currents? Nature operates >>> at the speed of light, right? A lot goes on in nature in 1/1000 of a >>> second that we don't even see. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sunday, May 11, 2014, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: >>> >>>> The specifications for the radar system below are typical of a pulsed >>>> radar system and not what I would expect from a standard Doppler radar. >>>> The duty cycle appears to be .1% for the unit listed whereas a Doppler >>>> radar is CW. The average power is 1300 watts of RF into the antenna, I >>>> assume. The gain of the antenna may be 34 dB relative to an isotropic >>>> radiator. >>>> >>>> Someone might be thinking of a pulsed Doppler radar which measures the >>>> change in transmit frequency of the returning pulses to get target velocity >>>> information. That type of radar is not a standard Doppler. >>>> >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> >>>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>>> Sent: Sun, May 11, 2014 9:18 pm >>>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio >>>> >>>> Stewart, >>>> >>>> I have glanced at your web site. I have not taken a close look at >>>> your research, but I would not be surprised if you ended up being onto >>>> something about doppler radar being a source of hypoxia, oxygen free >>>> radicals and the death of nearby animal and plant life. You also have a >>>> theory of dark matter, and a hunch that dark matter is indirectly >>>> responsible for the conclusions concerning doppler radar that you arrive at >>>> in your informal research. >>>> >>>> On the connection to dark matter, I personally have no opinion. I am >>>> skeptical, however, that your research is sufficient to establish any kind >>>> of linkage between the effects of doppler radar and dark matter, however. >>>> In light of this doubt, I think you might be able to get your >>>> investigation into doppler radar out to a wider audience if you did not >>>> combine it with the question of dark matter. Adding dark matter into the >>>> mix asks too much of people in their suspension of disbelief for them to be >>>> able to give much credibility to your doppler radar hunch, even if both >>>> hunches ended up being true. >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:55 PM, ChemE Stewart <cheme...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Radar/Call SignMHTModel ASR-9Max Pulsed Power (Watts)1,300,000Gain >>>>> (dBi)34Frequency (MHz)2,800RPM12.5Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km >>>>> 10.39Pulse Duration(uSec)1.00Pulse Repition Factor (Hz)1,000Range >>>>> Est. (Miles)60Latitude42.937248 Longitude-71.437286FIPS33011County >>>>> HillsboroughStateNH >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >
