Any light that originates as a result of absorption and then re-emitted would surely move at the speed of 'c' relative to the scattering source.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. <hoyt-stea...@cox.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Mon, Jun 30, 2014 10:31 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum Interesting idea. Would light just being absorbed in dust then re-emitted cause a delay ( highly dispersive, though, I'd guess). From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 7:15 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:A complicated vacuum Consider the following: Light could be considered the passing of electromagnetic fields through space. Certainly the wavelength gets much larger as the frequency of the emission approaches zero Hertz. If you take into account that the fact that the time of travel appears to be the same for light of varying wavelengths then something like this might be happening: As the wave propagates through space it encounters charged particles. Each of these will scatter the wave to a degree due to the interaction of the fields with the charged particles. The net wave shape will become more complex as a result and should exhibit interference patterns. I suspect that this will tend to cause the incoming waves to effectively slow down and approach the average velocity of the matter that it encounters. Neutrinos on the other hand are only effected by gravity as far as is known. Could this difference in behavior cause the light to slow down relative to the neutrinos? Dave ...Measurements here on Earth picked up the arrival of both photons and neutrinos from the blast but there was a problem—the arrival of the photons was later than expected, by 4.7 hours... This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
