In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 8 Jul 2014 16:28:32 -0700: Hi, [snip] >However, if hydrogen was added continuously during the long run (as >expected), then the amount consumed would tell us "volumes" about the nature >of the reaction by knowing the thermal output per atom consumed. If it was >in the range of 200 eV per atom of H2 then we are talking f/H reactions, and >if it is MeV range and up, per atom consumed, then we are talking nuclear. > >We need to see these results, but according to the sparse record of the >Hot-Cat, and the fixed amount of starting fuel - then the reaction is most >likely neither LENR or the hydrino. > >In fact, that strange outcome - requiring the mention of a vacuum/ZPE/Dirac >source of energy transfer, would be very difficult for all of those PhDs to >swallow, and thus responsible for a much longer delay than if the reaction >can be pinned to nuclear.
I agree. However lets see the numbers before jumping to conclusions. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
