On Sat, 2011-07-16 at 21:22 -0400, Marc Paré wrote: > Le 2011-07-15 18:02, drew a écrit : > > On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 19:44 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote: > >> Hi Marc, *, > >> > >> Am Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011, 23:52:40 schrieb Marc Paré: > >>> Le 2011-07-13 16:45, drew a écrit : > >>>> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 22:33 +0200, Andreas Mantke wrote:
< snip > > >> > >>> We still also need to add a statement on the "Home" page regarding our > >>> support for OpenSource license (preferably "copy left"). You had > >>> mentioned this in another thread and I have it on my to-do-help list. > >>> Italo should also take part in creating this statement, just so that we > >>> are all on the same wavelength. > >>> > >>> ============== > >>> > >>> We need some more text on the front page or for a page with a link from > >>> the front > >>> page where we explain that we support only extensions / templates under > >>> a OpenSource > >>> license (preferable copy left). Maybe Italo or others could give more > >>> input for this > >>> task. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Andreas > >>> > >>> [http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.websi > >>> te/5504] ============== > >> > >> Yes, I remember ;-) > >> > >> Could you please make a first draft for this? I can create you and Italo > >> an account > >> on the website and generate a new page for this, if that helps. > > > > Hi, > > > > I really do not agree with the idea that more discussion of license > > needs be on the front page - it seems quite clear already. More > > information on the application and on extensions perhaps, but not about > > license. > > > > //drew > > > > > > > Hi Drew, > > Sorry, could you point me to the page where it is made clear? I may have > missed it. --- I am not saying this to annoy anyone, just trying to see > if extension/template contributors will have some kind of idea of the > LibO license preferences so that these same people are not annoyed at > finding out otherwise. Last line on the page: "LibreOffice remains committed to providing users with quality software authored under free software licenses, and, as such, our catalogue of extensions and templates are published under free software licenses." How much more needs saying, what else is there to say in _this_ context. If we want to embelish the front page of the site, and I agree with that idea, then do so about the software - some dynamic content about recent extension or template uploads, or highest rated, or something we can brainstorm on that. > > We should try to make our web/wiki pages as informative as possible. Agreed. regarding the software. Best wishes, //drew -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
