I wrote: > it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault for accumulating their > rage instead of communicating it early
I unintentionally skipped a couple words. I meant to say: > it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault, *such* *as* for > accumulating their rage instead of communicating it early -- svetlana On Thu, 4 Dec 2014, at 14:47, svetlana wrote: > Hi all. > > I can see clear interest in everyone on this thread wanting to figure out the > right way to do it. Let's not jinx it by painting WMF Fundraising as the > "guys who break" and community as "the gwho rage". Both these groups are > rather capable of working things out (unlike the "...who break" and "...who > rage" terms indicate). > > Ryan Lane wrote: > > You have a community that's upset [...] > > Don't even say more. "We" are the supporters of the Wikimedia movement. That > includes Lila, that includes the fundraising folks, that includes you and me > and many other people. I don't see a reason to isolate any of these people > and blame. > > I, for one, appreciate Lila for catalyzing this thread into communication > with Fundraising Team. Such communication was clearly lacking (and when it > is, it's usually both sides of the conversation at fault for accumulating > their rage instead of communicating it early). > > -- > svetlana > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
