-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Morten Warncke-Wang: > What do you think? Seem like a useful idea if we can find sufficient > resources, and put together a management plan?
no, like Daniel said, this is a waste of time and effort. i originally assumed that a research toolserver would be different in some technical sense, which might make at least some sense (although i've argued against that elsewhere in this thread). however, i completely fail to understand your reasoning here. is there some backstory i'm missing? did you apply for a Toolserver account and were rejected because you aren't a Wikipedia editor? does the WM-DE have a history of doing this? (i'm certainly not aware of it, if so...) if you want to improve the account approval process at the Toolserver, doesn't it make more sense to do that, rather than creating a completely new project to fix one small issue? - river. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (HP-UX) iEYEARECAAYFAkm5FnwACgkQIXd7fCuc5vJCTQCgrdu1UILmXifN4KAfMM64FVk5 seUAoKw3jUuQW9kp/aHdSqAs3lZBX82T =PRVy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l