-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Morten Warncke-Wang:
> What do you think? Seem like a useful idea if we can find sufficient
> resources, and put together a management plan?
no, like Daniel said, this is a waste of time and effort. i originally assumed
that a research toolserver would be different in some technical sense, which
might make at least some sense (although i've argued against that elsewhere in
this thread). however, i completely fail to understand your reasoning here.
is there some backstory i'm missing? did you apply for a Toolserver account
and were rejected because you aren't a Wikipedia editor? does the WM-DE have a
history of doing this? (i'm certainly not aware of it, if so...)
if you want to improve the account approval process at the Toolserver, doesn't
it make more sense to do that, rather than creating a completely new project to
fix one small issue?
- river.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (HP-UX)
iEYEARECAAYFAkm5FnwACgkQIXd7fCuc5vJCTQCgrdu1UILmXifN4KAfMM64FVk5
seUAoKw3jUuQW9kp/aHdSqAs3lZBX82T
=PRVy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
