It just means that they have their own fiber over-lashed with their coax
infrastructure.

"The cable television HFC architecture consists of five major components:

   1. the headend;
   2. optical fiber;
   3. feeder cable;
   4. drop cable; and
   5. terminal equipment."
   6.



On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>wrote:

> "traffic to be backhauled over the Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC) cable plant"
>
> Must be fiber for data and coax for DC.  I thought it was DOCSIS over coax.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.ruckuswireless.com/press/releases/20130610-ruckus-adds-zoneflex-7781cm-access-point-to-its-portfolio
>>
>> $5k MSRP. Even at half that...ouch!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>wrote:
>>
>>>  Anyideas on the cost? It would be a great addition to any aerial fiber
>>> built out
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Gino A. Villarini
>>>
>>> g...@aeronetpr.com
>>>
>>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>>>
>>> 787.273.4143
>>>
>>> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Zach Mann
>>> *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2013 10:30 AM
>>> *To:* WISPA General List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's not just Comcast, TW, Cox are also taking advantage of the
>>> simplicity of the newer 7781-CM Access Point.   They are offering free wifi
>>> to existing clients for retention.  Down the road cellular offloading....
>>> 802.11u
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Matt Hoppes <mhop...@indigowireless.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> That's one way to avoid pole attachment fees! LOL.
>>>
>>> What is Comcast trying to accomplish with these?
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Hoppes
>>> Director of Information Technology
>>> Indigo Wireless
>>> +1 (570) 723-7312
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/15/13, 9:26 AM, Zach Mann wrote:
>>> > He's talking about these... (see attached)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Scott Carullo
>>>
>>> > <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >     I'm not talking about the ones in peoples homes, I'm talking about
>>> >     the ones the cable carrier hangs on the lines outside runing
>>> through
>>> >     the city on every corner....  clear LOS to every tower around.
>>> >
>>> >     Scott Carullo
>>> >     Technical Operations
>>> >     855-FLSPEED x102
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >     *From*: "Brian Webster" <bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
>>> >     <mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com>>
>>> >     *Sent*: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:24 AM
>>> >     *To*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
>>> >     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
>>> >     *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >     One good thing about the higher bands and the noise floor is that
>>> >     free space loss works to your advantage. That being that a 5 GHz
>>> >     indoor Omni home AP router signal will fall off as an interference
>>> >     source as a much shorter distance than a 2.4 GHz device will. The
>>> >     laws of physics work in your favor.
>>> >
>>> >     Thank You,
>>> >
>>> >     Brian Webster
>>> >
>>>
>>> >     www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com>
>>> >
>>> >     www.Broadband-Mapping.com <http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com>
>>> >
>>> >     *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>>> >     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
>>> >     [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>>> >     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Scott Carullo
>>> >     *Sent:* Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:52 PM
>>> >     *To:* Matt Hoppes; sc...@brevardwireless.com
>>> >     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>; WISPA General List
>>> >     *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >     Hard to tell, noise floor is noise floor which keeps creeping up -
>>> >     we all know things work better when its quiet.  This used to worry
>>> >     me a lot when I saw it coming, but then I realized it was already
>>> >     there and I had no idea until I just happened to scan on some
>>> radios
>>> >     (I don't usually install the stuff).  I'm not worried any more, if
>>> >     its not one thing it will be another any way.  Thats what gives us
>>> >     the edge every day, flexibility.  We will work around it, we
>>> always do.
>>> >
>>> >     I figure a high gain antenna on a tower with a good directional CPE
>>> >     will continue to work fine.  Their omni low gain antenna can't
>>> >     compete with a 20-30db directional one.  Still sucks though, you
>>> >     drive down the street and see one after another running 5Ghz just
>>> >     knowing there probably isn't 3 connections in the whole city to
>>> them....
>>> >
>>> >     Scott Carullo
>>> >     Technical Operations
>>> >     855-FLSPEED x102
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >     *From*: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com
>>> >     <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>>
>>> >     *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:43 PM
>>> >     *To*: "sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com
>>> >"
>>> >     <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>,
>>> >     "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org <mailto:
>>> wireless@wispa.org>>
>>> >     *Cc*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
>>> >     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
>>> >     *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >     Are you seeing any impact from them?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     On Nov 14, 2013, at 18:03, "Scott Carullo"
>>>
>>> >     <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >         Yeah, won't matter either way with a 5Ghz AP on every street
>>> >         corner.  Already seeing that in our areas....  do a wireless
>>> >         scan and you see 354 5Ghz APs now in addition to the 2Ghz ones
>>> >         (they run dual band APs now).
>>> >
>>> >         Scott Carullo
>>> >         Technical Operations
>>> >         855-FLSPEED x102
>>> >
>>>
>>> >
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >         *From*: "Bret Clark" <bcl...@spectraaccess.com
>>> >         <mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com>>
>>> >         *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:49 PM
>>> >         *To*: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
>>> >         *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz
>>> spectrum.
>>>
>>> >
>>> >         What could go wrong with Comcast taking up yet more 5GHz of
>>> >         spectrum...[/sarcasm off]
>>> >
>>> >         On 11/14/2013 01:40 PM, ralph wrote:
>>> >
>>> >             I hope the links at the bottom come through.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >             Comcast needs the FCC to open up the 5 GHz spectrum band to
>>> >             power next-generation Wi-Fi services that could allow it to
>>> >             deliver wireless broadband at speeds of up to 1 Gbps, SVP
>>> of
>>> >             Business Development Tom Nagel testified at a House Energy
>>> >             and Commerce hearing on Wednesday.
>>> >
>>> >             Nagel disclosed in his prepared testimony that Comcast has
>>> >             expanded the number of Wi-Fi access points for Xfinity
>>> >             high-speed Internet customers to 350,000. The nation's
>>> >             largest cable MSO also began deploying wireless gateways
>>> >             from Cisco earlier this year that Comcast has said may be
>>> >             able to power millions of neighborhood hotspots.
>>> >
>>> >             While Comcast already is already using the 5 GHz band,
>>> Nagel
>>> >             said it needs more of the unlicensed spectrum to meet
>>> demand
>>> >             from subscribers for Wi-Fi. It faces potential opposition
>>> >             from Toyota and other automobile manufacturers who want to
>>> >             use the 5 GHz band to deliver next-generation connected car
>>> >             applications, including applications that would warn
>>> drivers
>>> >             of collision threats.
>>> >
>>> >             Toyota principal researcher John Kenney raised concerns
>>> >             about possible interference from Wi-Fi services at
>>> >             Wednesday's hearing.  "We have been actively engaged with
>>> >             the Wi-Fi community and other stakeholders who are
>>> exploring
>>> >             possible sharing solutions that will alleviate any risk of
>>> >             harmful interference from unlicensed devices. But we're not
>>> >             there yet and it's going to take a bit more time to see if
>>> >             we can get there," Kenney said in his prepared testimony.
>>> >
>>> >             For more:
>>> >             - see Nagel's prepared testimony
>>>
>>> >             <
>>> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=207&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
>>> (.pdf)
>>>
>>> >             - see Kenney's prepared testimony
>>>
>>> >             <
>>> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=187&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
>>> (.pdf)
>>>
>>> >             - see Comcast blog post
>>>
>>> >             <
>>> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=118&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
>>> >
>>> >             - /Broadcasting & Cable/ has this story
>>> >             <
>>> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=190&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >         _______________________________________________
>>> >         Wireless mailing list
>>> >         Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>>>
>>> >         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>> >     Wireless mailing list
>>>
>>> >     Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>>>
>>> >     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Wireless mailing list
>>> > Wireless@wispa.org
>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to