Headend > Fiber > Node > Coax Plant

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Zach Mann <zma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It just means that they have their own fiber over-lashed with their coax
> infrastructure.
>
> "The cable television HFC architecture consists of five major components:
>
>    1. the headend;
>    2. optical fiber;
>    3. feeder cable;
>    4. drop cable; and
>    5. terminal equipment."
>    6.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
> > wrote:
>
>> "traffic to be backhauled over the Hybrid Fiber Coaxial (HFC) cable plant"
>>
>> Must be fiber for data and coax for DC.  I thought it was DOCSIS over
>> coax.
>>
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> http://www.ruckuswireless.com/press/releases/20130610-ruckus-adds-zoneflex-7781cm-access-point-to-its-portfolio
>>>
>>> $5k MSRP. Even at half that...ouch!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Anyideas on the cost? It would be a great addition to any aerial
>>>> fiber built out
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gino A. Villarini
>>>>
>>>> g...@aeronetpr.com
>>>>
>>>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>>>>
>>>> 787.273.4143
>>>>
>>>> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
>>>> Behalf Of *Zach Mann
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2013 10:30 AM
>>>> *To:* WISPA General List
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's not just Comcast, TW, Cox are also taking advantage of the
>>>> simplicity of the newer 7781-CM Access Point.   They are offering free wifi
>>>> to existing clients for retention.  Down the road cellular offloading....
>>>> 802.11u
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Matt Hoppes <
>>>> mhop...@indigowireless.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's one way to avoid pole attachment fees! LOL.
>>>>
>>>> What is Comcast trying to accomplish with these?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Matt Hoppes
>>>> Director of Information Technology
>>>> Indigo Wireless
>>>> +1 (570) 723-7312
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 11/15/13, 9:26 AM, Zach Mann wrote:
>>>> > He's talking about these... (see attached)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Scott Carullo
>>>>
>>>> > <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >     I'm not talking about the ones in peoples homes, I'm talking about
>>>> >     the ones the cable carrier hangs on the lines outside runing
>>>> through
>>>> >     the city on every corner....  clear LOS to every tower around.
>>>> >
>>>> >     Scott Carullo
>>>> >     Technical Operations
>>>> >     855-FLSPEED x102
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >     *From*: "Brian Webster" <bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
>>>> >     <mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com>>
>>>> >     *Sent*: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:24 AM
>>>> >     *To*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
>>>> >     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
>>>> >     *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >     One good thing about the higher bands and the noise floor is that
>>>> >     free space loss works to your advantage. That being that a 5 GHz
>>>> >     indoor Omni home AP router signal will fall off as an interference
>>>> >     source as a much shorter distance than a 2.4 GHz device will. The
>>>> >     laws of physics work in your favor.
>>>> >
>>>> >     Thank You,
>>>> >
>>>> >     Brian Webster
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >     www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com>
>>>> >
>>>> >     www.Broadband-Mapping.com <http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com>
>>>> >
>>>> >     *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>>>> >     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
>>>> >     [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
>>>> >     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Scott Carullo
>>>> >     *Sent:* Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:52 PM
>>>> >     *To:* Matt Hoppes; sc...@brevardwireless.com
>>>> >     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>; WISPA General List
>>>> >     *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >     Hard to tell, noise floor is noise floor which keeps creeping up -
>>>> >     we all know things work better when its quiet.  This used to worry
>>>> >     me a lot when I saw it coming, but then I realized it was already
>>>> >     there and I had no idea until I just happened to scan on some
>>>> radios
>>>> >     (I don't usually install the stuff).  I'm not worried any more, if
>>>> >     its not one thing it will be another any way.  Thats what gives us
>>>> >     the edge every day, flexibility.  We will work around it, we
>>>> always do.
>>>> >
>>>> >     I figure a high gain antenna on a tower with a good directional
>>>> CPE
>>>> >     will continue to work fine.  Their omni low gain antenna can't
>>>> >     compete with a 20-30db directional one.  Still sucks though, you
>>>> >     drive down the street and see one after another running 5Ghz just
>>>> >     knowing there probably isn't 3 connections in the whole city to
>>>> them....
>>>> >
>>>> >     Scott Carullo
>>>> >     Technical Operations
>>>> >     855-FLSPEED x102
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> >     *From*: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com
>>>> >     <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>>
>>>> >     *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:43 PM
>>>> >     *To*: "sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:
>>>> sc...@brevardwireless.com>"
>>>> >     <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>,
>>>> >     "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org <mailto:
>>>> wireless@wispa.org>>
>>>> >     *Cc*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
>>>> >     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
>>>> >     *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >     Are you seeing any impact from them?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     On Nov 14, 2013, at 18:03, "Scott Carullo"
>>>>
>>>> >     <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >         Yeah, won't matter either way with a 5Ghz AP on every street
>>>> >         corner.  Already seeing that in our areas....  do a wireless
>>>> >         scan and you see 354 5Ghz APs now in addition to the 2Ghz ones
>>>> >         (they run dual band APs now).
>>>> >
>>>> >         Scott Carullo
>>>> >         Technical Operations
>>>> >         855-FLSPEED x102
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> >         *From*: "Bret Clark" <bcl...@spectraaccess.com
>>>> >         <mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com>>
>>>> >         *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:49 PM
>>>> >         *To*: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
>>>> >         *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz
>>>> spectrum.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >         What could go wrong with Comcast taking up yet more 5GHz of
>>>> >         spectrum...[/sarcasm off]
>>>> >
>>>> >         On 11/14/2013 01:40 PM, ralph wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >             I hope the links at the bottom come through.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >
>>>> >             Comcast needs the FCC to open up the 5 GHz spectrum band
>>>> to
>>>> >             power next-generation Wi-Fi services that could allow it
>>>> to
>>>> >             deliver wireless broadband at speeds of up to 1 Gbps, SVP
>>>> of
>>>> >             Business Development Tom Nagel testified at a House Energy
>>>> >             and Commerce hearing on Wednesday.
>>>> >
>>>> >             Nagel disclosed in his prepared testimony that Comcast has
>>>> >             expanded the number of Wi-Fi access points for Xfinity
>>>> >             high-speed Internet customers to 350,000. The nation's
>>>> >             largest cable MSO also began deploying wireless gateways
>>>> >             from Cisco earlier this year that Comcast has said may be
>>>> >             able to power millions of neighborhood hotspots.
>>>> >
>>>> >             While Comcast already is already using the 5 GHz band,
>>>> Nagel
>>>> >             said it needs more of the unlicensed spectrum to meet
>>>> demand
>>>> >             from subscribers for Wi-Fi. It faces potential opposition
>>>> >             from Toyota and other automobile manufacturers who want to
>>>> >             use the 5 GHz band to deliver next-generation connected
>>>> car
>>>> >             applications, including applications that would warn
>>>> drivers
>>>> >             of collision threats.
>>>> >
>>>> >             Toyota principal researcher John Kenney raised concerns
>>>> >             about possible interference from Wi-Fi services at
>>>> >             Wednesday's hearing.  "We have been actively engaged with
>>>> >             the Wi-Fi community and other stakeholders who are
>>>> exploring
>>>> >             possible sharing solutions that will alleviate any risk of
>>>> >             harmful interference from unlicensed devices. But we're
>>>> not
>>>> >             there yet and it's going to take a bit more time to see if
>>>> >             we can get there," Kenney said in his prepared testimony.
>>>> >
>>>> >             For more:
>>>> >             - see Nagel's prepared testimony
>>>>
>>>> >             <
>>>> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=207&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
>>>> (.pdf)
>>>>
>>>> >             - see Kenney's prepared testimony
>>>>
>>>> >             <
>>>> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=187&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
>>>> (.pdf)
>>>>
>>>> >             - see Comcast blog post
>>>>
>>>> >             <
>>>> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=118&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
>>>> >
>>>> >             - /Broadcasting & Cable/ has this story
>>>> >             <
>>>> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=190&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >         _______________________________________________
>>>> >         Wireless mailing list
>>>> >         Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>>>>
>>>> >         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     _______________________________________________
>>>> >     Wireless mailing list
>>>>
>>>> >     Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>>>>
>>>> >     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Wireless mailing list
>>>> > Wireless@wispa.org
>>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wireless mailing list
>>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wireless mailing list
>>> Wireless@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to