http://www.ruckuswireless.com/press/releases/20130610-ruckus-adds-zoneflex-7781cm-access-point-to-its-portfolio

$5k MSRP. Even at half that...ouch!


On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote:

>  Anyideas on the cost? It would be a great addition to any aerial fiber
> built out
>
>
>
> Gino A. Villarini
>
> g...@aeronetpr.com
>
> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
>
> 787.273.4143
>
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Zach Mann
> *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2013 10:30 AM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>
>
>
> It's not just Comcast, TW, Cox are also taking advantage of the simplicity
> of the newer 7781-CM Access Point.   They are offering free wifi to
> existing clients for retention.  Down the road cellular offloading....
> 802.11u
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Matt Hoppes <mhop...@indigowireless.com>
> wrote:
>
> That's one way to avoid pole attachment fees! LOL.
>
> What is Comcast trying to accomplish with these?
>
>
> Matt Hoppes
> Director of Information Technology
> Indigo Wireless
> +1 (570) 723-7312
>
>
> On 11/15/13, 9:26 AM, Zach Mann wrote:
> > He's talking about these... (see attached)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Scott Carullo
>
> > <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     I'm not talking about the ones in peoples homes, I'm talking about
> >     the ones the cable carrier hangs on the lines outside runing through
> >     the city on every corner....  clear LOS to every tower around.
> >
> >     Scott Carullo
> >     Technical Operations
> >     855-FLSPEED x102
> >
> >
> >
>
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     *From*: "Brian Webster" <bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com
> >     <mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com>>
> >     *Sent*: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:24 AM
> >     *To*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
> >     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
> >     *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>
> >
> >     One good thing about the higher bands and the noise floor is that
> >     free space loss works to your advantage. That being that a 5 GHz
> >     indoor Omni home AP router signal will fall off as an interference
> >     source as a much shorter distance than a 2.4 GHz device will. The
> >     laws of physics work in your favor.
> >
> >     Thank You,
> >
> >     Brian Webster
> >
>
> >     www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com>
> >
> >     www.Broadband-Mapping.com <http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com>
> >
> >     *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> >     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>
> >     [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org
> >     <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Scott Carullo
> >     *Sent:* Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:52 PM
> >     *To:* Matt Hoppes; sc...@brevardwireless.com
> >     <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>; WISPA General List
> >     *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>
> >
> >     Hard to tell, noise floor is noise floor which keeps creeping up -
> >     we all know things work better when its quiet.  This used to worry
> >     me a lot when I saw it coming, but then I realized it was already
> >     there and I had no idea until I just happened to scan on some radios
> >     (I don't usually install the stuff).  I'm not worried any more, if
> >     its not one thing it will be another any way.  Thats what gives us
> >     the edge every day, flexibility.  We will work around it, we always
> do.
> >
> >     I figure a high gain antenna on a tower with a good directional CPE
> >     will continue to work fine.  Their omni low gain antenna can't
> >     compete with a 20-30db directional one.  Still sucks though, you
> >     drive down the street and see one after another running 5Ghz just
> >     knowing there probably isn't 3 connections in the whole city to
> them....
> >
> >     Scott Carullo
> >     Technical Operations
> >     855-FLSPEED x102
> >
>
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >     *From*: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com
> >     <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>>
> >     *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:43 PM
> >     *To*: "sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>"
> >     <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>,
> >     "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org
> >>
> >     *Cc*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org
> >     <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>>
> >     *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>
> >
> >     Are you seeing any impact from them?
> >
> >
> >     On Nov 14, 2013, at 18:03, "Scott Carullo"
>
> >     <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >         Yeah, won't matter either way with a 5Ghz AP on every street
> >         corner.  Already seeing that in our areas....  do a wireless
> >         scan and you see 354 5Ghz APs now in addition to the 2Ghz ones
> >         (they run dual band APs now).
> >
> >         Scott Carullo
> >         Technical Operations
> >         855-FLSPEED x102
> >
>
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >         *From*: "Bret Clark" <bcl...@spectraaccess.com
> >         <mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com>>
> >         *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:49 PM
> >         *To*: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>
> >         *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum.
>
> >
> >         What could go wrong with Comcast taking up yet more 5GHz of
> >         spectrum...[/sarcasm off]
> >
> >         On 11/14/2013 01:40 PM, ralph wrote:
> >
> >             I hope the links at the bottom come through.
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >             Comcast needs the FCC to open up the 5 GHz spectrum band to
> >             power next-generation Wi-Fi services that could allow it to
> >             deliver wireless broadband at speeds of up to 1 Gbps, SVP of
> >             Business Development Tom Nagel testified at a House Energy
> >             and Commerce hearing on Wednesday.
> >
> >             Nagel disclosed in his prepared testimony that Comcast has
> >             expanded the number of Wi-Fi access points for Xfinity
> >             high-speed Internet customers to 350,000. The nation's
> >             largest cable MSO also began deploying wireless gateways
> >             from Cisco earlier this year that Comcast has said may be
> >             able to power millions of neighborhood hotspots.
> >
> >             While Comcast already is already using the 5 GHz band, Nagel
> >             said it needs more of the unlicensed spectrum to meet demand
> >             from subscribers for Wi-Fi. It faces potential opposition
> >             from Toyota and other automobile manufacturers who want to
> >             use the 5 GHz band to deliver next-generation connected car
> >             applications, including applications that would warn drivers
> >             of collision threats.
> >
> >             Toyota principal researcher John Kenney raised concerns
> >             about possible interference from Wi-Fi services at
> >             Wednesday's hearing.  "We have been actively engaged with
> >             the Wi-Fi community and other stakeholders who are exploring
> >             possible sharing solutions that will alleviate any risk of
> >             harmful interference from unlicensed devices. But we're not
> >             there yet and it's going to take a bit more time to see if
> >             we can get there," Kenney said in his prepared testimony.
> >
> >             For more:
> >             - see Nagel's prepared testimony
>
> >             <
> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=207&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
> (.pdf)
>
> >             - see Kenney's prepared testimony
>
> >             <
> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=187&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0>
> (.pdf)
>
> >             - see Comcast blog post
>
> >             <
> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=118&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
> >
> >             - /Broadcasting & Cable/ has this story
> >             <
> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=190&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0
> >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Wireless mailing list
> >         Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>
> >         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Wireless mailing list
>
> >     Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org>
>
> >     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wireless mailing list
> > Wireless@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> Wireless@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to