Uh...Unifi... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 16, 2013 10:28 AM, "John Thomas" <jtho...@quarnet.com> wrote:
> Hey Ubiquiti, here is an idea for a new product... :-) > > Sent with AquaMail for Android > http://www.aqua-mail.com > > On November 15, 2013 6:51:00 AM Eric Muehleisen wrote: > > > http://www.ruckuswireless.com/press/releases/20130610-ruckus-adds-zoneflex-7781cm-access-point-to-its-portfolio > > $5k MSRP. Even at half that...ouch! > > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: > >> Anyideas on the cost? It would be a great addition to any aerial fiber >> built out >> >> >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> >> g...@aeronetpr.com >> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >> >> 787.273.4143 >> >> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On >> Behalf Of *Zach Mann >> *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2013 10:30 AM >> *To:* WISPA General List >> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. >> >> >> >> It's not just Comcast, TW, Cox are also taking advantage of the >> simplicity of the newer 7781-CM Access Point. They are offering free wifi >> to existing clients for retention. Down the road cellular offloading.... >> 802.11u >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Matt Hoppes <mhop...@indigowireless.com> >> wrote: >> >> That's one way to avoid pole attachment fees! LOL. >> >> What is Comcast trying to accomplish with these? >> >> >> Matt Hoppes >> Director of Information Technology >> Indigo Wireless >> +1 (570) 723-7312 <%2B1%20%28570%29%20723-7312> >> >> >> On 11/15/13, 9:26 AM, Zach Mann wrote: >> > He's talking about these... (see attached) >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Scott Carullo >> >> > <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>> wrote: >> > >> > I'm not talking about the ones in peoples homes, I'm talking about >> > the ones the cable carrier hangs on the lines outside runing through >> > the city on every corner.... clear LOS to every tower around. >> > >> > Scott Carullo >> > Technical Operations >> > 855-FLSPEED x102 >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > *From*: "Brian Webster" <bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com >> > <mailto:bwebs...@wirelessmapping.com>> >> > *Sent*: Friday, November 15, 2013 8:24 AM >> > *To*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org >> > <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>> >> > *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. >> >> > >> > One good thing about the higher bands and the noise floor is that >> > free space loss works to your advantage. That being that a 5 GHz >> > indoor Omni home AP router signal will fall off as an interference >> > source as a much shorter distance than a 2.4 GHz device will. The >> > laws of physics work in your favor. >> > >> > Thank You, >> > >> > Brian Webster >> > >> >> > www.wirelessmapping.com <http://www.wirelessmapping.com> >> > >> > www.Broadband-Mapping.com <http://www.Broadband-Mapping.com> >> > >> > *From:*wireless-boun...@wispa.org >> > <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org> >> > [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org >> > <mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org>] *On Behalf Of *Scott Carullo >> > *Sent:* Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:52 PM >> > *To:* Matt Hoppes; sc...@brevardwireless.com >> > <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>; WISPA General List >> > *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. >> >> > >> > Hard to tell, noise floor is noise floor which keeps creeping up - >> > we all know things work better when its quiet. This used to worry >> > me a lot when I saw it coming, but then I realized it was already >> > there and I had no idea until I just happened to scan on some radios >> > (I don't usually install the stuff). I'm not worried any more, if >> > its not one thing it will be another any way. Thats what gives us >> > the edge every day, flexibility. We will work around it, we always >> do. >> > >> > I figure a high gain antenna on a tower with a good directional CPE >> > will continue to work fine. Their omni low gain antenna can't >> > compete with a 20-30db directional one. Still sucks though, you >> > drive down the street and see one after another running 5Ghz just >> > knowing there probably isn't 3 connections in the whole city to >> them.... >> > >> > Scott Carullo >> > Technical Operations >> > 855-FLSPEED x102 >> > >> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > *From*: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com >> > <mailto:mhop...@indigowireless.com>> >> > *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 6:43 PM >> > *To*: "sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com >> >" >> > <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>>, >> > "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org >> >> >> > *Cc*: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org >> > <mailto:wireless@wispa.org>> >> > *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz spectrum. >> >> > >> > Are you seeing any impact from them? >> > >> > >> > On Nov 14, 2013, at 18:03, "Scott Carullo" >> >> > <sc...@brevardwireless.com <mailto:sc...@brevardwireless.com>> >> wrote: >> > >> > Yeah, won't matter either way with a 5Ghz AP on every street >> > corner. Already seeing that in our areas.... do a wireless >> > scan and you see 354 5Ghz APs now in addition to the 2Ghz ones >> > (they run dual band APs now). >> > >> > Scott Carullo >> > Technical Operations >> > 855-FLSPEED x102 >> > >> >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > >> > *From*: "Bret Clark" <bcl...@spectraaccess.com >> > <mailto:bcl...@spectraaccess.com>> >> > *Sent*: Thursday, November 14, 2013 5:49 PM >> > *To*: wireless@wispa.org <mailto:wireless@wispa.org> >> > *Subject*: Re: [WISPA] Comcast asking FCC for more 5GHz >> spectrum. >> >> > >> > What could go wrong with Comcast taking up yet more 5GHz of >> > spectrum...[/sarcasm off] >> > >> > On 11/14/2013 01:40 PM, ralph wrote: >> > >> > I hope the links at the bottom come through. >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> > Comcast needs the FCC to open up the 5 GHz spectrum band to >> > power next-generation Wi-Fi services that could allow it to >> > deliver wireless broadband at speeds of up to 1 Gbps, SVP of >> > Business Development Tom Nagel testified at a House Energy >> > and Commerce hearing on Wednesday. >> > >> > Nagel disclosed in his prepared testimony that Comcast has >> > expanded the number of Wi-Fi access points for Xfinity >> > high-speed Internet customers to 350,000. The nation's >> > largest cable MSO also began deploying wireless gateways >> > from Cisco earlier this year that Comcast has said may be >> > able to power millions of neighborhood hotspots. >> > >> > While Comcast already is already using the 5 GHz band, Nagel >> > said it needs more of the unlicensed spectrum to meet demand >> > from subscribers for Wi-Fi. It faces potential opposition >> > from Toyota and other automobile manufacturers who want to >> > use the 5 GHz band to deliver next-generation connected car >> > applications, including applications that would warn drivers >> > of collision threats. >> > >> > Toyota principal researcher John Kenney raised concerns >> > about possible interference from Wi-Fi services at >> > Wednesday's hearing. "We have been actively engaged with >> > the Wi-Fi community and other stakeholders who are exploring >> > possible sharing solutions that will alleviate any risk of >> > harmful interference from unlicensed devices. But we're not >> > there yet and it's going to take a bit more time to see if >> > we can get there," Kenney said in his prepared testimony. >> > >> > For more: >> > - see Nagel's prepared testimony >> >> > < >> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=207&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0> >> (.pdf) >> >> > - see Kenney's prepared testimony >> >> > < >> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=187&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0> >> (.pdf) >> >> > - see Comcast blog post >> >> > < >> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=118&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0 >> > >> > - /Broadcasting & Cable/ has this story >> > < >> http://links.mkt1985.com/ctt?kn=190&ms=NzE0MjgxOQS2&r=NDc2MTk4ODcyMzcS1&b=0&j=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&mt=2&rj=MTc5NzA2OTg3S0&rt=0 >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wireless mailing list >> > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> >> >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wireless mailing list >> >> > Wireless@wispa.org <mailto:Wireless@wispa.org> >> >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Wireless mailing list >> > Wireless@wispa.org >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> Wireless@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
