> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of mike > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 9:30 AM > > I would prefer something like 15+1 :) I want ZFS to be able to detect > and correct errors, but I do not need to squeeze all the performance > out of it (I'll be using it as a home storage server for my DVDs and > other audio/video stuff. So only a few clients at the most streaming > off of it)
I would not risk raidz on that many disks. A nice compromise may be 14+2 raidz2, which should perform nicely for your workload and be pretty reliable when the disks start to fail. -- paul
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
