On 6/20/07, Paul Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would not risk raidz on that many disks. A nice compromise may be 14+2 raidz2, which should perform nicely for your workload and be pretty reliable when the disks start to fail.
Would anyone on the list not recommend this setup? I could live with 2 drives being used for parity (or the "parity" concept) I would be able to reap the benefits of ZFS - self-healing, corrupted file reconstruction (since it has some parity to read from) and should have decent performance (obviously not smokin' since I am not configuring this to try for the fastest possible) _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
