Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

it further > >> > > >> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pinot Project be and hereby is responsible > >> for the creation and maintenance of software related to distributed OLAP > >> data store to provide Real-time Analytics to power wide variety of > >&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Pinot (Incubating) as a TLP

it further > >> > > >> > RESOLVED, that the Apache Pinot Project be and hereby is responsible > >> for the creation and maintenance of software related to distributed OLAP > >> data store to provide Real-time Analytics to power wide variety of > >&g

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache AGE Sub Project - Visualization Tool

Sounds great. Is this already built? If it is, it is a software donation (software grant process) On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 2:11 PM Eya Badal wrote: > Dear Everyone, > @All Mentors > > I hope you are doing great. > > We would like to discuss the possibility of having a sub-project for > Apache

Re: Post-release of Sedona Python 1.0.1?

You can’t skip the release vote process but you can make the vote a lot easier / cleaner if the only diff / commit is the one line change. We can a quick role in dev@ and once there is 3 votes (like today) we bring it to IPMC for 72hr. Hopefully it’s not too bad. Unfortunately you will need to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1

+1 (binding) carry over from dev@ On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 1:17 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to start a vote for Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating RC1 > > Sedona community vote thread: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating-rc1

docs/archive is for the old GeoSpark docs. We keep it in the doc website > for users who are still using GeoSpark, instead of Sedona. The generated > docs are put here: http://sedona.apache.org/archive/download/overview/ > > Thanks, > Jia > > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 10:50

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.1-incubating-rc1

1. You probably shouldn't put .md doc on release share - if I understand the suggestion is to include it into the src.tar.gz (and into the source repo) so that they are git tagged and packaged together 2. Do you have java artifacts that should be staged? 3. checklist incubating in name signature

Re: Review request for Apache Maturity Model Assessment for Pinot

Great! From: Seunghyun Lee Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 5:08:42 PM To: dev@pinot.apache.org Subject: Review request for Apache Maturity Model Assessment for Pinot Hi all, I have finished the initial draft of Apache Maturity Model Assessment document for Pinot.

Upcoming Sedona talk

https://databricks.com/session_na21/large-scale-geospatial-indexing-and-analysis-on-apache-spark I will be talking about Sedona (which we use!)

Re: DISCUSS Pinot Graduation

ast year and we did not hear any objections from the board. Thanks, Kishore G On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 8:38 PM Felix Cheung mailto:felixche...@apache.org>> wrote: Generally it looks good, I’ve checked clutch report, website checks etc, but a few reminders and areas to pay attention to: - dev

Re: DISCUSS Pinot Graduation

Generally it looks good, I’ve checked clutch report, website checks etc, but a few reminders and areas to pay attention to: - dev@ traffic is very or almost zero? I realize the community is active on slack and summary is sent to dev@ everyday, but some traffic there will be good... - ... because

Re: [MENTORS] Incubator report submitted

I can sign off Sedona. Will check to update whimsy now On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 11:57 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > The report has been submitted. > > The Sedona and Spot reports do not have sign-off by mentors, so please > sign off here [1] before the board meets. > > Thanks, > Justin > >

Re: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - May 2021

Reminder From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 6:04:08 PM To: d...@pinot.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - May 2021 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It

Re: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - May 2021

Reminder From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2021 6:04:11 PM To: d...@sedona.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - May 2021 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.4.0

+1 drivers/nodejs/src/index.ts - is there a reason this file does not have Apache License header? - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - source files have ASF headers - see note at the top

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.1 RC0

Carry over my vote +1 binding On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 4:04 PM Fu Xiang wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Pinot (incubating) version > 0.7.1. > > Apache Pinot (incubating) is a distributed columnar storage engine that can > ingest data in realtime and serve

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.1 RC0

+1 -incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers From: Chinmay Soman Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 8:49:40 PM To: Daniel Lavoie Cc:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.10.0

+1 binding - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine you should include year 2021 in NOTICE - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:37 AM Kris Calvin wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > I

Re: Welcoming six new Apache Spark committers

Welcome! From: Driesprong, Fokko Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 1:25:33 PM To: Matei Zaharia Cc: Spark Dev List Subject: Re: Welcoming six new Apache Spark committers Well deserved all! Welcome! Op vr 26 mrt. 2021 om 21:21 schreef Matei Zaharia

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

my +1 > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:03 AM Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> I propose that we run the vote anyway, thus ensuring IPMC oversight and > >> (post)approval, and then update the release runbook to make sure this > &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

m IPMC was > missed before making the release. > > What is the right thing to do at this point? Should we cut another release > or can we go ahead with this and ensure that this does not happen again. > > thanks, > Kishore G > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:59 AM Felix Cheung > w

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC1

Unfortunately this isn’t the right process for a podling release. As the mentor, I am sorry to see the release is not up to the standard upheld by previous releases. On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 7:02 AM kezhenxu94@apache wrote: > I think this release violates the Apache release policy because it

Re: [DISCUSS] AGE Container Support

I’d like to point out the while it is convenient, as per policy, an Apache project should not have “official” or dev binaries that created nightly or similarly that is not an approved, voted release. In other words, dev tag on development branch should be clearly marked as not an official

Status from website checks

https://whimsy.apache.org/pods/project/sedona

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announcing Apache Spark 3.1.1

Congrats and thanks! From: Hyukjin Kwon Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 4:09:23 PM To: Dongjoon Hyun Cc: Gabor Somogyi ; Jungtaek Lim ; angers zhu ; Wenchen Fan ; Kent Yao ; Takeshi Yamamuro ; dev ; user @spark Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announcing Apache Spark

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announcing Apache Spark 3.1.1

Congrats and thanks! From: Hyukjin Kwon Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 4:09:23 PM To: Dongjoon Hyun Cc: Gabor Somogyi ; Jungtaek Lim ; angers zhu ; Wenchen Fan ; Kent Yao ; Takeshi Yamamuro ; dev ; user @spark Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Announcing Apache Spark

Re: [VOTE] Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.7.0 RC0

signing key should use a @apache.org address - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE is fine NOTICE should have year 2021? Copyright 2018-2020 The Apache Software Foundation https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice - No

Re: [DISCUSS] Put all GeoTools jars into a package on Maven Central

entral to bring those Sedona required GeoTools jars to > Maven Central. Since it is LGPL, it might be OK to do so. > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:18 PM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > Who owns or manages GeoTools if it is LGPL? > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:01 PM Jia Yu

Re: [DISCUSS] Put all GeoTools jars into a package on Maven Central

Who owns or manages GeoTools if it is LGPL? On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:01 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Pawel, > > Python-adapter module is always being used by users. But it does not come > with GeoTools. To use it, users have to (1) compile the source code of > Python-adapter, or (2) add GeoTools

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

; >> >> >> >> On 02/4/2021 11:47，Jia Yu wrote： >> Dear all, >> >> We need to collect more votes in order to get this approved. Please take a >> look at our release when you have time. >> >> Thank you very much! >> Jia >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache AGE (incubating) version 0.3.0 (RC1)

+1 Notes from checks: incubating in name the file should probably be called apache-age-0.3.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz instead of incubator-age-0.3.0.rc0-incubating.tar.gz - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

che APISIX PMC Chair > Twitter: _WenMing > > > Jia Yu 于2021年2月4日周四 上午11:47写道： > > > Dear all, > > > > We need to collect more votes in order to get this approved. Please take > a > > look at our release when you have time. > > > > Thank yo

Re: Stream-stream join in structured streaming

This could be highly interesting! From: Youngwoo Kim (김영우) Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 7:03:36 PM To: Jia Yu Cc: dev@sedona.apache.org Subject: Re: Stream-stream join in structured streaming Got it, thank you Jia for noticing that! Youngwoo On Tue, Feb 2,

Re: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - February 2021

Reminder From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:20:06 PM To: d...@pinot.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Pinot Report Reminder - February 2021 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache

Re: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - February 2021

Reminder From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 10:20:08 PM To: d...@sedona.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - February 2021 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona 1.0.0-incubating rc1

+1 (binding) Carry from dev@ On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:02 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to start a vote for the first release of Apache Sedona > 1.0.0-incubating rc1 > > Sedona community vote thread: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sedona (incubating) rc1

Let’s close this vote and move to IPMC On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 8:30 AM Mo Sarwat wrote: > I vote +1 > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 1:26 AM Jia Yu wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is a call for vote on Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0 rc1. Please > > refer to the changes listed at the bottom of

Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin community sync up meeting

+1 From: Eric Pugh Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 5:28:59 AM To: users Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Zeppelin community sync up meeting I’d advocate for a regular quarterly run well versus a monthly that ends up sparsely attended and a scramble to setup. The

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sedona (incubating) rc1

https://sedona.staged.apache.org/download/publish/. > The "compile code" is still available: > https://sedona.staged.apache.org/download/compile/ > > Regards, > Jia > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 5:46 PM Felix Cheung > wrote: > >> 1/ the tarball should unpack to incub

Re: [VOTE] Apache Sedona (incubating) rc1

1/ the tarball should unpack to incubator-sedona-sedona-1.0.0-incubating and not incubator-sedona-sedona-1.0.0-incubating-rc1 - this is because once the vote is passed, you will not be rebuilding the tarball - as the one we voted on, signed etc, that one will be the actual release. 2. also

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

disclaimer. Please advise. We will wait for your advice and then call for a VOTE. Best regards, On 2021/01/18 02:59:15, Felix Cheung wrote: > Yes. See the link I included in my reply for subject, format and content. > > > > From: Eya Badal > Sent:

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

the feedback. >Where should I post the thread vote? Should I post it in AGE Dev list and ask >everyone to vote? On 2021/01/15 02:20:01, Felix Cheung wrote: > Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be > just the mentor. > > A good vote thread mig

Re: Request for First AGE Apache Release Review - VOTE

Did you have a vote thread? Anyone and everyone can vote, it shouldn’t be just the mentor. A good vote thread might be like: http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Spark-3-1-0-RC1-td30524.html 1. md5 - should not include 2. apache-age-0.3.0-incubating-src.tar.gz

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0

> be > > able to publish it before rc3. > > > > If you have any questions, refer to the voting results of other items in > > the incubation list. Of course, you are welcome to discuss it in your > email. > > > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Sedona (incubating) 1.0.0

We should definitely have the source release on https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ We are voting for source release (and the git tag) - binaries are for convenience. Von, can you clarify the final package name inline? I think you are looking at the artifact ID not a package name?

Re: Sedona 1.0 Maven release is staged

/api/javadoc auto generated? if that is the case, we probably shouldn't have the HTML committed in the repo 5. /trunk/import/* what is this for? 6. should add a small section on how to build (or link to) the project in README.md On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 6:24 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > Yes >

Re: Sedona 1.0 Maven release is staged

eline: https://incubator.apache.org/guides/distribution.html > > If you scroll down to the bottom, you will see the section. > > @Felix Cheung Felix, does Pawel need to be > aware of anything else, besides the incubator PyPi guideline? > > Thank you very much! > Jia > > On

Re: Sedona 1.0 Maven release is staged

ription: > cid:image001.jpg@01C85203.36A2AF30] > -- > *From:* Paweł Kociński > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 30, 2020 22:09 > *To:* Jia Yu > *Cc:* dev@sedona.apache.org; Jinxuan Wu; Mohamed Sarwat; Netanel Malka; > Zongsi Zhang; Felix Cheung; Netanel Malka >

Re: Recovering SparkR on CRAN?

consider > dropping it as Dongjoon initially pointed out. > > 2020년 12월 30일 (수) 오후 1:59, Felix Cheung 님이 작성: > >> Ah, I don’t recall actually - maybe it was just missed? >> >> The last message I had, was in June when it was broken by R 4.0.1, which >> was fixed. >

Re: Recovering SparkR on CRAN?

-31918 and > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32073. > I wonder why other releases were not uploaded yet. Do you guys know any > context or if there is a standing issue on this, @Felix Cheung > or @Shivaram Venkataraman > ? > > 2020년 12월 23일 (수) 오전 11:21, Mridul Mu

Re: Recovering SparkR on CRAN?

Ok - it took many years to get it first published, so it was hard to get there. On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 5:45 PM Hyukjin Kwon wrote: > Adding @Shivaram Venkataraman and @Felix > Cheung FYI > > 2020년 12월 23일 (수) 오전 9:22, Michael Heuer 님이 작성: > >> Anecdotally, as a projec

Re: JIRA notification

I’d think you just open a ticket on INFRA, similar to this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-20830 On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 2:21 AM Jia Yu wrote: > Hi Felix, > > I notice that JIRA does not send notifications to us or the dev list so I > sometimes miss users' JIRA ticket. > > When I

Re: Podling Crail Report Reminder - December 2020

Reminder : From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2020 4:01:28 PM To: d...@crail.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Crail Report Reminder - December 2020 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache

Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - December 2020

Reminder: From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2020 4:01:34 PM To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - December 2020 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator

Re: First Sedona release

ovided" in > Sedona's POM.xml. If a user wants to use CRS transformation in Sedona, they > will have to add some GeoTools library by themselves. > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 6:24 PM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 6:03 PM Felix Cheung > > wr

Re: First Sedona release

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 6:03 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > I’d strongly recommend the community to move towards the first release > with the WIP disclaimer > > https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#work_in_progress_disclaimer > > https://incubator.apache.org/poli

Re: First Sedona release

F has any recommended work > arounds for shipping code with licenses that it does not approve of. > > Cheers, > > Jim > > On 11/23/20 1:41 PM, Felix Cheung wrote: > > I can help review around Dev 13 to give a first pass. It should give you > an > > easier path t

Re: First Sedona release

t; > > >>> I totally agree with Jim on that. Jim, would you like to take the > lead > > >> on that - I trust that you can bring this task to completion. Jia, > would > > >> you please let us know how we can incorporate the changes into the

Re: JTS 1.16.2

I believe this is the jts discussion in the other thread. On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:54 PM Netanel Malka wrote: > Hi Jia, > I tried to use the branch sedona-1.0-doc but the artifact for 1.16.2 is > not in the Maven Central so I cannot compile the project. > > I got: > The POM for

Re: Support Spark 2.4 in Sedona 1.0

each Spark version: >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/blob/master/spark/pom.xml#L185 >> > >> > >> > Do you think this method is better? >> > >> > >> > >> > Netanel Malka, >> > Big Data Consultant >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC1

gt; that the next POC will pick it up. > > Thanks, > Jack > > On 2020/11/11 04:05:49, Felix Cheung wrote: > > +1 but > > > > it was discussed before, but thirdeye is not included in the source > release > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-

Re: Support Spark 2.4 in Sedona 1.0

I am not sure it should be a branch? It is common to deal with this as a compile target, not as a separate branch. A separate branch might have difficulty to release? There are a few example in projects where they handle multiple Spark target version like this. On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 12:56 PM

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.6.0 RC1

+1 but it was discussed before, but thirdeye is not included in the source release https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/blob/master/pinot-distribution/pinot-source-assembly.xml#L39 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.38.0 based on Superset 0.38.0rc3

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers From: Jim Jagielski Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 9:56:55 AM To:

Re: Long queue time on travis-ci

Hello, There has been, in the past, incidents where the shared Travis resource is exhausted. It might help if you restrict to build one branch (like main) only. Some projects have acquired corporate sponsorship for a separate Travis instance. Some has moved to another system, like GitHub

Re: First Sedona release

Great progress! To add, A) I’d strongly recommend the WIP disclaimer - it would be much easier to pass with in the first release https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers B) more info in signing, checksum https://infra.apache.org/release-signing.html C) signing key should

Re: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - November 2020

Reminder. From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 10:54:49 PM To: d...@sedona.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - November 2020 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 binding On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:21 AM Timothy Chen wrote: > +1 binding as well > > Tim > > Sent via Superhuman iOS > > > On Wed, Oct 21 2020 at 08:18, Sebastian Schelter wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > On 2020/10/19 17:29:23, Tianqi Chen wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Superset (incubating) as a Top Level Project

+1 ;) On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 2:31 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for addressing everything I brought up here and on your private > list. There's still a little more to do, but it’s being dealt with, so I’m > all good with you graduating. Do keep an eye on how you

Re: [Draft] Zeppelin Board report Oct 2020

Looks good On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 9:01 PM Jeff Zhang wrote: > +1, Thanks moon > > moon soo Lee 于2020年10月15日周四 上午11:58写道： > >> Hi Folks, >> >> Since the report due date is 14/Oct, I made a draft of it. >> Please review this. >> >> ## Description: >> >> - Apache Zeppelin is a collaborative

Re: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - October 2020

Thx On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 10:42 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Yes, indeed. I am not sure why. I copied the content back and now it has > all sections and text. > > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 8:39 PM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > Thanks- it looks like the report is truncated? It se

Re: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - October 2020

> On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 5:31 PM Jia Yu wrote: > > > Hi Felix, > > > > I will write the report tomorrow. I will let you guys know once I am > done. > > > > Thanks, > > Jia > > > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2020 at 5:18 PM Felix Cheung > > wrote: &

Re: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - October 2020

Any volunteer for this report? On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 6:07 PM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your quarterly board report. > > The board meeting is

Re: "Issues" mailing is not available?

Maybe it is moderation? Although I don’t think I’ve seen any mail that is pending moderation. But generally we can have discussion in dev@ issues@ in a lot of projects are dedicated only for JIRA updates (which could be a lot) On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 7:38 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Hello Felix, > >

Re: "Issues" mailing is not available?

Maybe it is moderation? Although I don’t think I’ve seen any mail that is pending moderation. But generally we can have discussion in dev@ issues@ in a lot of projects are dedicated only for JIRA updates (which could be a lot) On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 7:38 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Hello Felix, > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.2

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - did not compile On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:31 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > > > +1 (binding, carrying over my

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.1

+1 - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Hello IPMC, > > The Apache Superset (incubating) community has voted on

Re: Podling Superset Report Reminder - September 2020

Great - I did 2 days ago. From: Maxime Beauchemin Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2020 9:19:17 AM To: dev@superset.apache.org Subject: Re: Podling Superset Report Reminder - September 2020 Thank you Junlin for authoring the report this quarter. @Felix we'd love

Re: Progresso of the initial setup

Great. Do you mean issue should go to JIRA? issues@ should just be a feed of JIRA On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 3:14 AM Jia Yu wrote: > Hello all, > > 1. Sedona website has been moved to http://sedona.apache.org/ It is still > using the old content for now. The new website will come soon. > > 2.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC2

+1 Thanks for the update. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files find (some test .gz are there) - Source files have ASF headers (except tests & config) - Did not try compile from source On Fri, Sep 4, 2020

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Pinot (incubating) 0.5.0 RC1 (Please ignore the earlier email sent under non apache Email)

It’s a bit strange under node_modules. - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - Unexpected binary files Several strange files are in the source tarball

Re: Podling Crail Report Reminder - September 2020

Actually I just saw it. Thanks for putting it together. It is great to hear updates on (hopefully) generating more activities From: Felix Cheung Sent: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 12:35:24 PM To: dev@crail.apache.org ; d...@crail.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re

Re: Podling Age Report Reminder - September 2020

Any volunteers to write this report? From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 6:55:20 PM To: d...@age.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Age Report Reminder - September 2020 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf

Re: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - September 2020

Actually I just saw the update from this morning It’s here https://github.com/apache/incubator-sedona On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:33 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > Fantastic. Thank you for all the details. Hopefully the source import will > be completed soon. > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020

Re: Podling Crail Report Reminder - September 2020

Reminder on report From: jmcl...@apache.org Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 6:55:15 PM To: d...@crail.incubator.apache.org Subject: Podling Crail Report Reminder - September 2020 Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache

Re: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - September 2020

Fantastic. Thank you for all the details. Hopefully the source import will be completed soon. On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 1:14 AM Jia Yu wrote: > Thanks for the comments. I have fixed that. > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:06 PM Felix Cheung > > wrote: > > > >

Re: Podling Sedona Report Reminder - September 2020

Thank you! For last release please change to N/A - I think that is referring to ASF release. Also if you could answer the last three questions in the report too. On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 5:43 PM Jia Yu wrote: > Dear Sedona Mentors and other committers, > > > > I just added some new content to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache TVM as TLP

+1 (binding) On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Tianqi Chen wrote: > Dear Incubator: > > > > Following a heated discussion with great support from our mentors, > > committers and community members. > > The Apache(incubating) TVM community has formally voted for graduation and > > bring the case

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.9.0 (release candidate 1)

+1 binding - incubating in name - signature and hash are fine - tarball (see note) the file unpacks into the current and not a subdirectory, is a bit strange - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - build from source

Re: Planning for the first Apache incubator release

Great! I’d recommend consider the WIP disclaimer https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#work_in_progress_disclaimer From: Furkan KAMACI Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2020 8:46:35 AM To: dev@teaclave.apache.org Subject: Re: Planning for the first

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.9.0

I see jlowe is a binding IPMC vote that can carry forward from dev@ vote. We just need 1 more binding vote. On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 11:06 PM Felix Cheung wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - incubating in name > - signature and hash fine > - DISCLAIMER is fine > - LICENSE a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache YuniKorn (Incubating) 0.9.0

+1 (binding) - incubating in name - signature and hash fine - DISCLAIMER is fine - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - No unexpected binary files - All source files have ASF headers - didn't try - compile from source On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:12 PM Wilfred Spiegelenburg wrote: > Hello IPMC > > > >

Re: Graduation

For Graduation readiness - Please consider going through https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html Here is an example https://unomi.apache.org/community-maturity-model-report.html It works as a guide not a rule, but good to understand where the project stands

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

Moon is now on IPMC. On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 7:26 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Thanks Dave, > > > > That's great news! I look forward to releasing in 5 hours then! > > > > Ville > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020, 16:49 Dave Fisher wrote: > > > > > Moon’s vote will become binding in 5 hours when 72

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

One more vote please! On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:59 AM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > We need one more vote please, we're anxious to publish this release! > > > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 11:17 AM Felix Cheung > wrote: > > > > > F

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.37.0

Furkan, can you help? On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:54 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Justin and Felix, > > > > warm thanks for taking the time to vote! The minimum 72h voting time is > now complete, and it would be great to get that last missing vote from the > IPMC to be able to release this highly

Re: Graduation

I can ack the items below for mentors. As for status - do you mean the podling status file? It’s in svn https://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initialize_podling_status_page From: Maxime Beauchemin Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 3:30:05 PM To:

Re: Podling report for Sedona

submit the CLA and then the code will be > > imported to ASF Git repo." > > > > I have contacted the committer Masha via an individual email several days > > ago but am still waiting for her response. > > > > Thanks, > > Jia > > > >

Re: Podling report for Sedona

Ok I will take out the date/placeholder. Jia - it will be great if you go add your thought in the bootstrapping. On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:23 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > > > > The report is already on the wiki page? I’m still trying to see > something is missing. > > > > It because I use

Re: Podling report for Sedona

The report is already on the wiki page? I’m still trying to see something is missing. On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 12:37 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > This report is now late, please submit it. > > Thanks, > > Justin > >

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >