Rick,
I agree with you completely. I wouldn't have researched the propnet
group without hearing about it here. I see where they are operating
probes as they call them below 10 meters. Not sure how legal that
is. After watching their 30 meter beacons for a while and seeing them
come up over
I know some of the comments and arguments here are boring at times.
However, they do serve a purpose in refining positions and educating
folks about the rules.
Let's face it, with the number of hams the US has we are an 800 pound
gorilla in amateur radio. Maybe not the only one, but certainly
What frequency were you using? Was it a keyboard mode that started
calling on top of you, or a modem mode? Hard to believe someone
with a keyboard mode and a waterfall display would start over top of
you, although there are jerks everywhere.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose
First, let me say that these recommendations are based solely upon
hopes and dreams. There are no facts or data with by which one can
adequately assess the recommendations. If you want to convince
someone that further segmentation of the rtty/data segments into
smaller and smaller pieces is a
But you're ignoring the aggregate effects. It's like showing your
wife a hair off an elephant that is rampaging through your house and
saying, no big deal, look it's just a little hair.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 07:26 PM
Yep, just what we need, more amateur to non-amateur messaging taking
place on the ham bands.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A. APRS (Automatic Position Reporting System) uses a Terminal Node
Controller (a type of radio modem) to
A couple of answers. One, is that as a service we are self-policing.
I think if you read the original document establishing this, it
didn't mean that each individual polices himself but rather that the
service as a whole polices itself routing out operations that don't
follow the rules. Part of
Part 97.3(a)(9) Beacon. An amateur station transmitting communications
for the purposes of observation of propagation and reception or other
related experimental activities.
Tell me where the mention of receiver or transceiver is in this
rule? It simply doesn't matter what the DESIGN of the
I've been remiss in answering some of your questions. You'll either
have the start of a pactor type emission or an illegal emission type.
I had this argument several years ago when pactor 3 showed up. If you
look at J7D, it is defined as Single-sideband, suppressed carrier;
with two or more
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Alan Barrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I personally had a Red Cross shelter leader run after my truck and
flag me down because she thought we were packing up. quote: You
don't know how much we still need you guys. Until you arrived we had
no
Les
At 08:13 AM 1/11/2008, jgorman01 wrote:
--- In
mailto:digitalradio%40yahoogroups.comdigitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
Alan Barrow ml9003@ wrote:
snip
I personally had a Red Cross shelter leader run after my truck and
flag me down because she thought we were packing up
Hate to tell you but some of us cranky, bitter, and rude (old) men
have simply been there and done that. You just don't want to hear
that. For example, do you think a permanently installed ham antenna
is going to survive on a roof top when all other commercial grade
antennas have been destroyed?
.
73,
Rick, KV9U
Alan Barrow wrote:
jgorman01 wrote:
Hate to tell you but some of us cranky, bitter, and rude (old) men
have simply been there and done that.
I certainly saw and worked with some generous kind old man hams
in my
efforts. (Shared a shelter operation
Does this ever increasing number of government agencies doing this
scare the bejeebers out of anybody. That is, the government buying
permanent infrastructure and someday wanting a return on investment,
like using it to augment regular communications?
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In
Services, Radio Shop
jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this ever increasing number of government agencies
doing this
scare the bejeebers out of anybody. That is, the government buying
permanent infrastructure and someday wanting a return on investment,
like using
Let me post a couple of quotes from a comment to rm-11392 and then
tell me that no government or organization in the US will use the
amateur equipment they purchase, EVER, for their own purposes when
they feel the financial pinch that you mention.
As an active member of numerous emergency
What rule says you can't leave an automatic station unattended? It
would be a great rule, but I don't see it.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Becker, WØJAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is one thing to be automatic and attended
and another to be automatic and
operator shall willfully or maliciously interfere
with or cause interference to any radio communication or signal.
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of jgorman01
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 5:09 PM
To: digitalradio
.
Rud Merriam K5RUD
ARES AEC Montgomery County, TX
http://TheHamNetwork.net
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of jgorman01
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 5:24 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject
is the time folks need
to be presenting concrete evidence to the fcc as to where limits
should be placed.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jgorman01 jgorman24@ wrote:
I'm not sure what HF Packet BBS's you're
One problem with your scenario is that the petition uses necessary
bandwidth for data emissions, you are describing occupied bandwidth
for phone/image emissions. From a practical standpoint there is a BIG
difference in determining the two.
Data emissions are nice because their parameters are
You bring up a good point and this is a good time to bring it up. The
definition of the Amateur Service in the US (and I think the ITU's is
the same) indicates the service is for radiocommunications between
duly authorized persons interested in radio technique solely with a
personal aim
I'm not sure what HF Packet BBS's you're talking about but all my
packet tnc's had a carrier detect feature and would not transmit if
one was detected. Was it perfect, heck no! But it was available AND
it was turned on.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Demetre SV1UY [EMAIL
I believe that if you are licensed by the fcc, you must obey fcc rules
and regulations when operating in international waters. Only when you
reach national waters do foreign rules and regs come into play.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Russell Hltn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On
Looks to me like it should be operating on 28.2028.30 MHz according
to 97.203d. Also, if the balloons path goes over the National Radio
Quiet Zone, 97.203(e)/97.3(a)(30) it looks like permission is supposed
to be obtained. Lastly, does foreign operation come into play and the
need for
to fix it with many
different distros eventually lead me away from Linux for now.
73,
Rick, KV9U
jgorman01 wrote:
Rick,
What sound card are you running?
Jim
WA0LYK
The nv driver is a generic open source software and give people
fits. Try the nvidia site for their linux driver. The nvidia
module and nv are two separate pieces of software. I had to set my
monitor to vesa with the nv driver in order to get it to work, and
not very well. With the nvidia
. I may try
rebooting and unplug/plug the audigy card in. All the other usb
devices seem to be detected ok.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Andrew O'Brien
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jgorman01 jgorman24@ wrote:
Is the MP3 an USB card or pci
I couldn't get fldigi to run. I get aborted with no explanation.
However, to answer your question, $HOME/.something is:
/root/.fldigi
$HOME = /root/
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, k5rud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a number of problems with the system. It booted fine. I
Rick,
What sound card are you running?
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too downloaded the .iso yesterday and immediately burned a CD to boot
both of my computers. While I do not expect Linux to be able to
properly
drive my Samsung SyncMaster
You have hit the nail on the head with the use of emergency service
as a simple justification for non-emergency use.
There is a COST to the use of amateur spectrum, primarily, time denied
to others. However, since there is no physical cost to automatic
stations, they have no incentive to
I'm sorry, but a mode that expands willy nilly from about ~500 Hz to
2.5 kHz AFTER a qso has started is just asking for trouble. This is
why busy detection will never work really well for pactor 3. If a
session starts and someone unknowingly starts another qso ON A CLEAR
FREQUENCY besides a
http://TheHamNetwork.net
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of jgorman01
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:11 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Why Amateur EmComm?
Lets discuss
Look up the definition in part 97 of harmful interference. Harmful
interference doesn't need to be either willful or malicious.
Automatic stations can be required to cease operation by the FCC if
they create harmful interference to ongoing radio communications.
This is what I believe Riley
How about an event just below an extinction of mankind catastrophe.
Perhaps a massive nuclear attack, a super volcano erupting, a very
large asteroid, or a glancing blow of a gamma ray burst from a dying
star in our galaxy!
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Because it was occurring right on published winlink channels. Could
some of them been kb2kb, sure, some of them could have been. However,
even then, there weren't that many kb2kb qso's on pactor taking place
in the auto sub-bands.
Why do you think winlink has spread their stations out? Without
Remember, this was a couple of years ago. Plus, it really doesn't
matter if it is kb2kb interfering with a pmbo session or two pmbo
sessions. There was obviously no busy detection nor did the
interfering operators listen first. It was still pactor on pactor
interference and that is the point.
Part of the problem is that there is a misunderstanding about who
should operate where. In the US at least, the frequencies shown for
automated wideband operation are NOT reserved or allocated for
this purpose. These are the frequencies automated stations using
wideband signals are restricted
Don't believe everything you hear. A couple of years ago when I was
doing packet work, I listened to winlink a lot. What I heard
convinced me that clients did not listen and that the hidden
transmitter was not only a problem with other stations, but winlink
stations too. You can't believe how
You are dealing with two issues here, continuous power output and
distortion caused by ALC.
PSK31 is basically like turning your transmitter on continuously. If
your rig is rated for continuous full output then you should have no
problem. Please recognize that most amateur rigs are rated for
I'm not sure soundings can be classified as beacons. The rule states
or other related experimental activities which indicates that
beacons have an experimental purpose, not one used for negotiating a
two way conversation. In other words, you can't have a two-way
conversation with a beacon.
The
The only problem I see with this is how several tens of thousands or
even hundreds of thousands of hams are going to do 10-20 seconds of
sounding even using whole segments of bands. There won't be any room
or time for actually talking! I just don't see this being good for
most HF communications.
Be careful what you ask for!
Would you really want 2,3, or 4 hundred thousand US hams doing ALE
soundings on all the bands? Even every six hours? How about using
data modes that are 20 kHz wide like the ARRL HSMM committee
recommended? How about with no busy detection? How about in 4 - 5
Except pactor 3 modems, in essence, choose the operating bandwidth in
an unattended fashion. Even in a keyboard to keyboard conversation,
a pactor 3 modem can vary its bandwidth based upon the signal strength
and do so without operator intervention. This means you might spend
15 minutes at 500
In addition,
97.3(a)(22) Harmful interference. Interference which endangers the
functioning of a radionavigation service or of other safety services
or seriously degrades, obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a
radiocommunication service operating in accordance with the Radio
Regulations.
I have let some folks in the ARRL know my thoughts but I also got the
impression they weren't interested.
Rather than concentrate on dedicated channels/sessions types of
protocols, it seems to me a multi-user/multi-session system would
better serve everyone. I know everyone cries about how slow
Let me point out that you are not talking about co-channel
interference to your signal. You are discussing interference to your
ability to use the spectrum. Two entirely different subjects.
Using your example, there is only one lane and that is all there will
ever be, just like the amateur
Your prescription for doing away with spectrum sharing is totally in
conflict with the amateur radio paradigm of shared spectrum/no owns a
frequency. It will result in the balkanization of the spectrum as
competing modes/protocols/services all ask for their piece of the
spectrum. You will
Perhaps you misunderstood what I was saying. Allowing designated
frequencies for just one purpose, in your case email, will open the
doors for requesting designated frequencies for all kinds of things,
not just mode restrictions. Some will want restricted frequencies for
qrp only, dx only,
As far as I know there is no amateur radio support even needed. Here
in Kansas the National Guard manages and is responsible for the State
EOC and for implementing support plans for all county and local EOC's.
They have also integrated plans with all the law enforcement agencies
for
After giving this some thought I wonder what HF rig would you use with
20 kHz bandwidth and what mode? What design criteria would be needed
to use this, especially in J3D?
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John B. Stephensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If I'm at the low end of an
meters.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: jgorman01
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 13:04 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: FCC regulations (was Digi Voice)
After giving this some thought I wonder what HF rig would you
Receivers may have this bandwidth, but there are no generally
available transmitters from the big manufacturers that I know of that
allow this bandwidth.
While the op-amps may be linear to greater than 20 kHz, they must also
be have a flat response curve. The ouputs may also be pretty linear
as
I must be one of the stupid folks that have a misconception about
what the withdrawn petition was to accomplish.
Could you enlighten us on just exactly what modes are being blocked
by the current regulations. What bands do these modes operate on?
What is the purpose of the blocked modes?
The
Can you give me a regulation that restricts very wide modems within
the phone/image segments. If you are talking about using data in the
phone/image segment, I'll agree but I don't see a paragraph that
limits bandwidth within the phone/image segment.
I will agree that wider bandwidths could be
: jgorman01
To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 15:18 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL wake up ..
I must be one of the stupid folks that have a misconception about
what the withdrawn petition was to accomplish.
Could you enlighten us
which is usually interpreted as 3 kHz. There is nothing allowing data
(computer communications) or RTTY (direct printing telegraphy) in the
phone/image segments. Unfortunately, image is defined as facsimile and
television.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: jgorman01
This is exactly what I've been trying to say, there is no bandwidth
limitations currently in the regs. Trying to argue that the ARRL's
bandwidth petition screwed up experimentation and stops people from
using newer, better modes just is not correct.
The only problem I have with your example is
Bonnie,
Where did the technology jail go that you have touted so many times
when discussing current regulations?
Secondly, how do you deal with the need to declare your proposal as a
standard so that manufacturers will begin to produce equipment?
Something this complicated will require a
Danny,
Very good points all. I had not thought about this in a situation
like Katrina. Can you imagine the ARC, Salvation Army, each local
EOC, and the state EOC all having different encryption keys? If
hundreds of hams show up to a disaster like this, who is going to
administer all the
Sorry to hear about the cancer. One of the nastier banes of human
existence.
Actually too many hams don't understand the rules and reg concerning
these terms. Read the definition of automatic control. On a simplex
frequency, how would a remote station exert control over the
transmitting
I don't know how hard it would be to pull this part of the software
out and run it on its own AND to control a transmitter with it.
Remember, the pmbo is probably seeing a CTS indication from the pactor
modem. You would have to use another receiver and pc running scamp
and somehow get the pmbo
; this clamped reset
is maintained until the SBD reports frequency clear for Y
consecutive seconds, after which the Server re-initializes the Pactor
Modem and returns to Idle. 60 Y 300.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jgorman01 jg6164@ wrote:
I
would definitely be trivial.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, jgorman01 jg6164@ wrote:
I really don't know anything about the pmbo software. What you
describe may be trivial from a system analysis standpoint but
actually
coding it may
My atomic clock changed right on time. I would have to look at the
manual, but the clock itself may have the software for DST. However,
WWV/B would have to put out a bit that says DST for the clock to have
known to change.
My clock does have time zone settings incorporated into the software.
I
Just a few thoughts:
* A busy detector is not a panacea for all qrm, especially as you look
at the lower bands. I can easily lay out a scenario for 80 meters or
daytime on 40m where the PMBO should transmit when the freq is busy.
This scenario happens less as you expand the skip zones on the
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a big problem if the activity detector senses the maximum
possible bandwidth to be possibly used. P3 exchanges are full
bandwidth for the server (some 2.4 kHz) and P2 bandwidth (500 Hz)
for the ARQ responses.
Ask yourself why scamp died. Do you really think the winlink users
who have spent a thousand dollars or more on pactor modems are going
to relish throwing that investment away because the winlink admin's
have decided to go to a soundcard mode?
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com,
This is misinformation that can be harmful to newbies or folks that
don't have the knowledge of about how the two different types of
signals (FSK versus AFSK) are generated.
At the most basic level, if you look at the math involved in
generating the two types of signals, i.e., FSK versus AFSK,
You just made my point by showing suppressed carrier and opposite
sideband values. The values you state are ok for properly operating
transmitters but how about non-properly operating transmitters? If
the FCC sends you a notice that you are transmitting a readily heard
suppressed carrier you
It's not that the distro's are not compatible. Distributions by the
different vendors, i.e. redhat, mandrake, suse, puppy, etc. pretty
much use the same linux kernels, libraries, and software. They are
generally just different conglomerations of software based upon what
the distro is aimed at.
The last distribution I bought, SUSE 9.3, was very easy to install and
most everything worked. Adding some programs was easy, some were
hard. I wanted to use my PC with my IPOD Shuffle and getting ITunes
replacement software working was difficult because I had to retrieve
and compile several
This really isn't hard. There were only three commands to use:
'./configure', 'make', and 'make install' to compile and install the
libraries. The hard part was doing the internet searches to find the
correct versions. This isn't really any more difficult than searching
the internet to find the
That's my one pet peeve about Linux. You go looking for a program to
do what you want and find out it is two years old and requires
libraries that have been updated 4 times since then. Sometimes trying
to find the older libraries is a real challenge. I would love it if
everyone would store the
It's not necessarily the automatic operation that cause the problem,
although they certainly can. The biggest problem is that pactor 3
modems are basically designed for commercial use and assume that once
they have a 3 kHz channel the whole channel belongs to them for the
entire session. The
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, DuBose Walt Civ AETC CONS/LGCA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please see below... Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jgorman01
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 9:36 PM
To: digitalradio
If the folks working on getting nerve responses to control artificial
limbs really wanted to make some money they would be working on how to
interface a cell phone keyboard via bluetooth directly to nerve
connections. My son would be standing in line to have it transplanted
tommorrow if he could
Your argument isn't logical.
If the NGO's don't have the resources to use the frequencies they
currently have assigned, where would the resources come from to allow
them to use amateur service frequencies reassigned to the land
fixed/mobile service? How would they convince the FCC to allocate
Let me paraphrase N7DC's comment. The local, state, and federal
governments and NGO's want our help - then they should provide the
equipment and the bandwidth for its use- and that bandwidth is out
there, assigned to agencies and NGO's now. I've checked and both the
Red Cross and Salvation Army
Except on 80m, when used to contact an automatic station in a mode
wider than 500 Hz.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John B. Stephensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Pactor-3 is as legal as it was before the Omnibus RO, but unless
you are sending a fax it is restricted to the new
When my windows pc's hard disk died about 1 1/2 yrs ago, I decided not
to replace it. I upgraded my linux box to suse 9.3 and haven't looked
back. Open Office does everything I need in place of microsoft office.
You'll need to become comfortable with tar, ./configure, make, and
'make
Bonnie,
Why can't you use bandwidths of 500 or less in Olivia or MT63 to send
images in the narrow subbands? My copy of gMFSK allows setting
parameters of both protocols to values that should meet the
requirements of the new FCC rules. I recognize MT63 may not have an
occupied bandwidth of 500
Bonnie,
You need to revise your list somewhat, and everyone should know these
are not necessarily official. The ITU (more specifically Working
Party 8A) shows Pactor II as 375HJ2D and Pactor III as 2K20J2D. I
would assume these are as official as it gets.
In order for an emission to be classed
I've experienced some of this problem in the past too. I believe part
of the problem is that as you go up in freq, low angle radiation
(ground wave) is easier to achieve but the ground absorption increases
too. 15 meters seemed to be the best compromise. That is, 10m had
good low angle but high
I do have some concerns that would have been addressed by Bonnie's
strictures.
One, can everyone watching a waterfall display recognize a weak
Federal SSB or digital signal trying to claim the frequency?
Two, there are no restrictions on automatic stations. It looks to me
like auto stations
Funny, you didn't have any problem critizing Ed Hare and by fiat, the
ARRL on their position on BPL interference mitigation.
Seems to me that what's good for the goose is good for the gander!
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, I believe sooner or later there will be a conflict on a shared
frequency. If there isn't going to be a problem, then why bother
making it shared? When this occurs, if standard operating procedures
were laid out in the rulles, it would minimize the chance of conflict.
Jim
WA0LYK
--- In
anyway,
John - K8OCL
From: jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] 3kHz or 500Hz Re: Updates on effect of FCC RO
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:15:47 -
I suspect if there was one, wide bandwidth, 10 kHz
First, it ignores all the empirical evidence to the contrary. This
alone would make the statement suspect.
Second, it ignores the different methods and implementations of ALC in
different transmitters.
One of the first effects of ALC is the imposition of an amplitude
modulation on the RF
Actually, the statement that a solution is possible is unproven. A
more accurate one might be that a solution may be possible. However,
802.11 is NOT a good example to use in citing how it might be done!
The statement about 802.11 doesn't tell the whole story, not by a long
shot. These types
that the government
isn't providing the proper kind of communications.
Its not equipment...its trained radio operators.
Thanks,
getting off my soap box
73,
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jgorman01
Sent
You need to explain this further. Just making the statement that IM
is a better analogy just doesn't provide any information as to how it
applies to sharing of RF frequencies, at least not to me. You might
help me out by elucidating a little on just what shared resource with
IM is applicable to
I'll be honest here, I don't know if Pactor starts in mode P1 or P2 or
maybe either. I do know it doesn't connect in P3. It connects in one
of the slower modes and then expands to P3 if the signal is
sufficient. This means every pactor connection, where P3 is
available, does this and is one of
I'm not sure emergency communications is or should be the driver here.
I don't think anyone (or at least most) would begrudge some HF
frequencies be used for 3 kHz data during an actual emergency. Where
the fly is in the ointment is where these frequencies are desired 365
days a year (or some
to
the HF AP instead of at each other. If you are using a non-directional
antenna, then you would simply look for an AP in the area of the
world you
wish to work.
Simple.
From: jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject
Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
The old telephone party line is a poor analogy. Think more along
the lines
of IM when it comes to high-speed data users all sharing the same
frequency
at the same time.
73, John - K8OCL
From: jgorman01 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio
Yea, but that 100 word message could have been sent in about 3 minutes
using 30 wpm CW. I've done both, and the SSB'ers have a hard time
understanding that CW is that much faster than voice. Almost what you
quote for the 300 baud text data, and in a much smaller bandwidth.
Also, using your
PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
Let the software do the queuing...you just type away or send your
file, etc. If you think the queue is too large, QSY.
Walt/K5YFW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of jgorman01
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2006
users (waiting their turn) and a bandwidth of 2.4 KHz than with
narrower methods such as PSKmail with its ARQ PSK63 modulation.
Sincerely,
Rick, KV9U
jgorman01 wrote:
A couple of comments. The FCC must consider more than just how fast
data can be sent. It must also consider how
Starting in narrow mode, moving to wide mode, then back to narrow mode
will only work properly if you and everyone else doing it is
considerate and checks the adjacent frequencies adequately for
occupancy. Otherwise, you'll be just like winlink, start out in
narrow mode and go to wide mode
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
