I think that's why I was asking the questions about whether the standard is set in concrete. Multiple drafts, but no formal additions between 1.6 and 2.0. A few software programs support much of what is already in 2.0 but I see no acceptance of the differences between 1.6 and 2.0. I use the w: for lyrics under the notes, multiple clefs with the V:, symbols, etc. and wouldn't expect the software that uses them to drop them if those features never made it into any standard -- but I'm wondering if the standard as it exists will ever change. I get the perception that well thought out enhancements are very good suggestions that some use and others don't. If software supports a feature and it isn't difficult to include in the text abc file, why not?
Thanks for the reply. Hudson Lacerda wrote: >1.6 is the last official version of ABC standard. >It has not yet the V: field nor the %% commands! > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today! http://us.click.yahoo.com/cd_AJB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/mjFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/abcusers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
