On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 10:45, Hubert Figuiere wrote: > On Wed, 2002-03-20 at 10:21, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > Given this, I want to know: > > Why are the rpms I did not the official rpms? > There is no *official* RPM beside those that we provide on > sourceforge.net
This is not the answer for my question. This is the answer to: "Are there official RPMS for AbiWord?" or something close to that. > > Why is http://savannah.gnu.org/download/abiword is not even mentioned > > (not even as an alternative download site)? > Because you still insist on not using SourceForge as the main primary > site download site. We don't want to confuse users by 2 locations that > provide 2 different set of packages. There are good motives for doing that, and what you are asking me is to go against my principles. Would you provide an alternative place for upload for those who do not want to support VA's parting of the ways of free software development? There is already one, why be so agressive? Regards, rms -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi + So let's do it...?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part